User talk:67.135.49.198

Welcome!

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (67.135.49.198) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! And you've done excellent work to the Fireproof (film) article. Thanks! -- American Eagle (talk) 05:36, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

"Poe's law"

Thanks for chipping in, my head was starting to spin from all the repetitive arguments. -- Earle Martin [^t/_c] 19:27, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wedge strategy. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 12:37, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

February 2009

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. And weren't you going to put a notice on your sock talkpages, Jinxmchue? dave souza, talk 20:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

You've been engaged in edit-warring over several related pages. As such, I've blocked this IP address for 24 hours. When you regain editing privelages, please be sure to follow proper dispute resolution procedures.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

— Scientizzle 22:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

67.135.49.198 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Others are just as guilty. Block them, too, or you are only showing how biased the block is.

Decline reason:

Not a reason for unblocking. Toddst1 (talk) 22:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. . . . Jinx, stop edit warring to teleport the creation museum on the basis of a very dodgy source. Your disruptive editing is liable to get you blocked. . . dave souza, talk 20:07, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

March 2009

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Mike Doughney (talk) 05:42, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Dominionism. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Mike Doughney (talk) 06:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Conspiracy theories, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits at Dominionism to relate it to a conspiracy theory are also being reverted. Please don't add the reference to Conspiracy theories, either. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 20:17, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

April 2009

Hi. Please do not add unsourced information or original research to articles, as you did with this edit to Rational Response Squad. Doing so violates Wikipedia's policies on Verifiability and No Original Research. There is no indication at the YouTube page that that is the RRS' account, much less a date for the suspension. Please do not add information unless it is supported by reliable, verifiable sources. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 00:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC)