Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tilman Hausherr: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Tilman Hausherr]]: keep, notable |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*'''Delete''' Honestly, who hasn't written a link checking program? Creating a potentially notable web site with no other accomplishments qualifies the web site itself for an article rather than its unknown creator. --[[User:Lucent|Lucent]] 01:15, 16 November 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' Honestly, who hasn't written a link checking program? Creating a potentially notable web site with no other accomplishments qualifies the web site itself for an article rather than its unknown creator. --[[User:Lucent|Lucent]] 01:15, 16 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep'''. This guy is a notable critic of Scientology in Germany. If we keep [[Barbara Schwartz]] we must keep him. [[User:Pilatus|Pilatus]] 01:51, 16 November 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Keep'''. This guy is a notable critic of Scientology in Germany. If we keep [[Barbara Schwartz]] we must keep him. [[User:Pilatus|Pilatus]] 01:51, 16 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
*NN, D. We should delete the Schwartz article too. [[User:ComCat|ComCat]] 02:24, 16 November 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:24, 16 November 2005
Not notable, WP:Autobiography Dbchip 00:56, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Honestly, who hasn't written a link checking program? Creating a potentially notable web site with no other accomplishments qualifies the web site itself for an article rather than its unknown creator. --Lucent 01:15, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. This guy is a notable critic of Scientology in Germany. If we keep Barbara Schwartz we must keep him. Pilatus 01:51, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- NN, D. We should delete the Schwartz article too. ComCat 02:24, 16 November 2005 (UTC)