Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J.D. Lasica: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''Keep''' though I'm typically quick to hit the delete button on bloggers, this one is notable enough. [[User:Ohnoitsjamie|Jasmol]] 04:22, 16 November 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' though I'm typically quick to hit the delete button on bloggers, this one is notable enough. [[User:Ohnoitsjamie|Jasmol]] 04:22, 16 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' per Capitalistroadster. [[User:Durova|Durova]] 05:07, 16 November 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' per Capitalistroadster. [[User:Durova|Durova]] 05:07, 16 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
*Keep: This particular person is ''not'' known as a blogger, so Skrewler's question should be answered with "no, bloggers are not very notable." However, this particular person is a frequent commentator and a flavor of the year on DRM issues. He has been the flavor for long enough, too, that I think he's a stable presence. [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 10:57, 16 November 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:57, 16 November 2005
Not notable, does every blogger need their own wiki article? Skrewler 02:33, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- No. Delete as NN. ComCat 02:36, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. HAHAHAHA PLEASE stop making useless not notable non-encyclopediac articales on wikipedia. remember what wikipedia is not okay? 65.34.232.136 02:59, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Femmina 03:22, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep' Will someone stop nominating notable people as per WP:BIO. Had book published by Reed Darknet: Hollywood's War Against the Digital Generation published earlier this year which was reviewed by notable publications. Eight Google News references see [1] and 861,000 Google references. [2]. WP:WEB needs its own bloggers section. Capitalistroadster 03:29, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Stong. An author listed on amazon. A google search gets 944,000 hits. -- 24.68.132.132 03:31, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep though I'm typically quick to hit the delete button on bloggers, this one is notable enough. Jasmol 04:22, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep per Capitalistroadster. Durova 05:07, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep: This particular person is not known as a blogger, so Skrewler's question should be answered with "no, bloggers are not very notable." However, this particular person is a frequent commentator and a flavor of the year on DRM issues. He has been the flavor for long enough, too, that I think he's a stable presence. Geogre 10:57, 16 November 2005 (UTC)