Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J.D. Lasica: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*Keep: This particular person is ''not'' known as a blogger, so Skrewler's question should be answered with "no, bloggers are not very notable." However, this particular person is a frequent commentator and a flavor of the year on DRM issues. He has been the flavor for long enough, too, that I think he's a stable presence. [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 10:57, 16 November 2005 (UTC) |
*Keep: This particular person is ''not'' known as a blogger, so Skrewler's question should be answered with "no, bloggers are not very notable." However, this particular person is a frequent commentator and a flavor of the year on DRM issues. He has been the flavor for long enough, too, that I think he's a stable presence. [[User:Geogre|Geogre]] 10:57, 16 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' per Capitalistroadster and the anon commenting after he did. - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 10:59, 16 November 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' per Capitalistroadster and the anon commenting after he did. - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 10:59, 16 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' Worthless. Just another shitty blogger who thinks they are more important than anyone else. This is clearly not the case, unless we are going by the colour of their shit. --[[User:86.2.56.178|86.2.56.178]] 12:17, 16 November 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:17, 16 November 2005
Not notable, does every blogger need their own wiki article? Skrewler 02:33, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- No. Delete as NN. ComCat 02:36, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. HAHAHAHA PLEASE stop making useless not notable non-encyclopediac articales on wikipedia. remember what wikipedia is not okay? 65.34.232.136 02:59, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Femmina 03:22, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep' Will someone stop nominating notable people as per WP:BIO. Had book published by Reed Darknet: Hollywood's War Against the Digital Generation published earlier this year which was reviewed by notable publications. Eight Google News references see [1] and 861,000 Google references. [2]. WP:WEB needs its own bloggers section. Capitalistroadster 03:29, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Stong. An author listed on amazon. A google search gets 944,000 hits. -- 24.68.132.132 03:31, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep though I'm typically quick to hit the delete button on bloggers, this one is notable enough. Jasmol 04:22, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep per Capitalistroadster. Durova 05:07, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep: This particular person is not known as a blogger, so Skrewler's question should be answered with "no, bloggers are not very notable." However, this particular person is a frequent commentator and a flavor of the year on DRM issues. He has been the flavor for long enough, too, that I think he's a stable presence. Geogre 10:57, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep per Capitalistroadster and the anon commenting after he did. - Mgm|(talk) 10:59, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless. Just another shitty blogger who thinks they are more important than anyone else. This is clearly not the case, unless we are going by the colour of their shit. --86.2.56.178 12:17, 16 November 2005 (UTC)