Jump to content

Relatively hyperbolic group: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
painstaking copyedit
Examples: A hyperbolic group G can have a subgroup H so that G is not (even weakly) hyperbolic relative to H, so I changed "any subgroup" to "the trivial subgroup".
Line 22: Line 22:
== Examples ==
== Examples ==


* Any [[hyperbolic group]], such as a [[free group]] of finite rank or the fundamental group of a hyperbolic surface, is hyperbolic relative to any subgroup.
* Any [[hyperbolic group]], such as a [[free group]] of finite rank or the fundamental group of a hyperbolic surface, is hyperbolic relative to the trivial subgroup.


* The fundamental group of a [[complete]] [[hyperbolic manifold]] of finite volume is hyperbolic relative to its [[cusp subgroup]]. A similar result holds for any complete finite volume [[Riemannian manifold]] with pinched negative [[sectional curvature]].
* The fundamental group of a [[complete]] [[hyperbolic manifold]] of finite volume is hyperbolic relative to its [[cusp subgroup]]. A similar result holds for any complete finite volume [[Riemannian manifold]] with pinched negative [[sectional curvature]].

Revision as of 18:22, 22 April 2009

In mathematics, the concept of a relatively hyperbolic group is an important generalization of the geometric group theory concept of a hyperbolic group. The motivating examples of relatively hyperbolic groups are the fundamental groups of complete noncompact hyperbolic manifolds of finite volume.

Intuitive definition

A group G is relatively hyperbolic with respect to a subgroup H if, after contracting the Cayley graph of G along H-cosets, the resulting graph equipped with the usual graph metric becomes a δ-hyperbolic space and, moreover, it satisfies a technical condition which implies that quasi-geodesics with common endpoints travel through approximately the same collection of cosets and enter and exit these cosets in approximately the same place.

Formal definition

Given a finitely generated group G with Cayley graph Γ(G) equipped with the path metric and a subgroup H of G, one can constructed the coned off Cayley graph as follows. For each left coset gH, add a vertex v(gH) to the Cayley graph Γ(G) and for each element gh of gH, add an edge e(gh) of length 1/2 from gh to the v(gH). This results in a metric space that may not be proper (i.e. closed balls need not be compact). If H is a normal subgroup then the coned off Cayley graph is the same as the quotient graph of Γ(G) by the action of H.

The definition of a relatively hyperbolic group, as formulated by Bowditch goes as follows. A group G is said to be hyperbolic relative to a subgroup H if the coned off Cayley graph has the properties:

  • It is δ-hyperbolic and
  • it is fine: every edge belongs to finitely many simple cycles of bounded length.

If only the first condition holds then the group G is said to be weakly relatively hyperbolic with respect to H.

The definition of the coned off Cayley graph can be generalized to the case of a collection of subgroups and yields the corresponding notion of relative hyperbolicity. A group G which contains no collection of subgroups with respect to which it is relatively hyperbolic is said to be a non relatively hyperbolic group.

Properties

  • If a group G is relatively hyperbolic with respect to a hyperbolic group H, then G itself is hyperbolic.

Examples

  • Any hyperbolic group, such as a free group of finite rank or the fundamental group of a hyperbolic surface, is hyperbolic relative to the trivial subgroup.
  • The free abelian group Z2 of rank 2 is weakly hyperbolic, but not hyperbolic, relative to the cyclic subgroup Z: even though the graph is hyperbolic, it is not fine.
  • The mapping class group of an orientable finite type surface is either hyperbolic (when 3g+n<5, where g is the genus and n is the number of punctures) or is not relatively hyperbolic.

References

  • Mikhail Gromov, Hyperbolic groups, Essays in group theory, Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ., 8, 75-263, Springer, New York, 1987
  • Benson Farb, Relatively hyperbolic groups, Geom. Funct. Anal. 8 (1998), 810–840