Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/File:Yellow Wattlebird 2.jpg: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
support |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* '''Support as nominator''' --[[User:Noodle snacks|Noodle snacks]] ([[User talk:Noodle snacks|talk]]) 13:45, 19 April 2009 (UTC) |
* '''Support as nominator''' --[[User:Noodle snacks|Noodle snacks]] ([[User talk:Noodle snacks|talk]]) 13:45, 19 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support'''. [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 10:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Support'''. [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 10:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment'''. Not good composition, poor technically, and there is no doubt that next time you see one with your current setup you'll get a shot that far exceeds this, yet as far as I can tell passes all criteria on vpc. Still, do you really want to set this standard? [[User:Flying Freddy|Flying Freddy]] ([[User talk:Flying Freddy|talk]]) 15:15, 23 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
||
{{-}} |
{{-}} |
||
Revision as of 15:15, 23 April 2009
- Reason
- Noisy, and I had zero reach at the time. Still, pretty clear with only a bit of beak obscured. Wattlebirds and honeyeaters tend to spend most of their time in the bushes, so a clear shot is quite difficult.
- Articles this image appears in
- Yellow Wattlebird
- Creator
- Noodle snacks
- Support as nominator --Noodle snacks (talk) 13:45, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 10:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Comment. Not good composition, poor technically, and there is no doubt that next time you see one with your current setup you'll get a shot that far exceeds this, yet as far as I can tell passes all criteria on vpc. Still, do you really want to set this standard? Flying Freddy (talk) 15:15, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
