Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TEKSYSTEMS: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 4: Line 4:
:And then he removed it a second time... - [[User:Squibix|squibix]] 20:07, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
:And then he removed it a second time... - [[User:Squibix|squibix]] 20:07, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' it is then. [[User:Just zis Guy, you know?|Just zis <span style="border: 1px; border-style:solid">&nbsp;Guy,</span> you know?]] <sup>[[User_talk:Just zis Guy, you know?|[T]]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Just zis Guy, you know?|[C]]]</sub> [http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk (W)] ''[[User:Just zis Guy, you know?/AfD|AfD?]]'' 22:03, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
* '''Delete''' it is then. [[User:Just zis Guy, you know?|Just zis <span style="border: 1px; border-style:solid">&nbsp;Guy,</span> you know?]] <sup>[[User_talk:Just zis Guy, you know?|[T]]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Just zis Guy, you know?|[C]]]</sub> [http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk (W)] ''[[User:Just zis Guy, you know?/AfD|AfD?]]'' 22:03, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
* '''JC''' how about reading the webpage itself. Obviously none of us are going to spend the fee of $500 or a manual of $40 of magazine to do any type of true confirming of this [user:josephrussell|josephrussell] 09:10 17 November 2005
* '''REVISED''' how about reading the webpage itself. Obviously none of us are going to spend the fee of $500 or a manual of $40 for a magazine to do any type of true confirming of this - [[josephrussell|josephrussell]] 09:10, 17 November 2005(UTC)

Revision as of 14:13, 17 November 2005

This article claims notability for its subject ("Ranked number one in the industry by IT Services Business Report and as the nation's largest IT staffing firm") but I was unable to find any independant confirmation of the company's importance; that, combined with the fact that the article is written in the first person and largely copied from promotional text used elsewhere leads me to suggest deleting the whole thing as advertising. If the company is in fact important, of course, a complete rewrite would be fine. - squibix 14:35, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And then he removed it a second time... - squibix 20:07, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]