Talk:Lambda Phi Epsilon: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:19, 17 November 2005

Please do not re-add the section on hazing. I realize that Wikipedia entries are free for all to edit, the way it stands now is rife with unsubstantiated accusations and is clearly biased. Namely I take issue with the following excerpts:

"it is encouraged by the older members..." "Upon joining, pledges are told that this is all a 'lie'..." "...with the intention of harming the pledges"

These are obviously biased and unsubtantiated statements and in no way reflect any impartiality.

-Darren Chan

Mr. Chan, please edit the article in order to remove impartiality. Please do not completely remove the Hazing section as your fraternity obviously engages in hazing practices as evidenced by the Kenny Luong incident. Also, just because major news media coverage of it has been scarce does not mean it does not exist. Don't bullshit me.Iheartwiki19

Notice how entries for almost all fraternites fail to mention hazing. There is no way to be impartial when speaking of this matter. FAILING TO MENTION HAZING is not the same as DENYING IT EXISTS. Until you find some solid proof dont pretend to give a balanced view. Encylopedia entries are not for personal opinion. Also, cite your sources for the "troubled past" section or that will be deleted too. -DarrenChan

I cleaned up the article. Everything is now substantiated by a news article by a major news outlet. One is a blog post that quotes an LATimes article verbatim. I only used the information from the LATimes article. This may have to be taken to arbitration if you continue to delete large portions of information instead of editing them. -Iheartwiki19

I have requested protection for this page due to multiple reverts without reason. Iheartwiki19 01:57, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

edit: nevermind. -Timlee 21:04, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

24.11.211.182 - Can you please explain your POV edit? -Timlee 05:37, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

24.11.211.182 - I don't see any neutrality issues with the information presented on the page. Could you explain your edit? -Timlee 15:19, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 15:18, 17 November 2005 edit Timlee (talk \| contribs) 61 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:19, 17 November 2005 edit undo Timlee (talk \| contribs) 61 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 26:		Line 26:
	24.11.211.182 - Can you please explain your POV edit? -[[User:Timlee\|Timlee]] 05:37, 17 November 2005 (UTC)		24.11.211.182 - Can you please explain your POV edit? -[[User:Timlee\|Timlee]] 05:37, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

	24.11.211.182 - I don't see any neutrality issues with the information presented on the page. Could you explain your edit? -[[User:Timlee\|Timlee]] 15:18, 17 November 2005 (UTC)		24.11.211.182 - I don't see any neutrality issues with the information presented on the page. Could you explain your edit? -[[User:Timlee\|Timlee]] 15:19, 17 November 2005 (UTC)