Wikipedia:Peer review/Indigenous Australians/archive1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:41, 18 November 2005

Indigenous Australians

comprehensive article, with links off to plenty of articles on sections, it seems to qualify for most of the criteria on "What is a featured article" Astrokey44 05:13, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

While Adam and other have done a great job rewriting and reorganizing this article, it has no references (a requirement for an FA), and there are numerous summary sections with no content- like culture and Tasmanian aborigines. The lead is also too short and should be expanded to 2 - 3 paragraphs that summarise the article. I think it'd be a good idead to do away with the promient people section to and where possible work those names into the text. --nixie 05:21, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Could some of the existing links be turned into references? I've added to the summary sections that had previously no content, it looks a little better now. It probably is a good idea to put the prominent people into the article, although then where would you put the link to the Prominent indigenous Australians article? Astrokey44 08:37, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm impressed by this article.-gadfium 08:03, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 :While Adam and other have done a great job rewriting and reorganizing this article, it has no references (a requirement for an FA), and there are numerous summary sections with no content- like culture and Tasmanian aborigines. The lead is also too short and should be expanded to 2 - 3 paragraphs that summarise the article. I think it'd be a good idead to do away with the promient people section to and where possible work those names into the text. --[[User:Petaholmes|nixie]] 05:21, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
-::Could some of the existing links be turned into references? I've added to the summary sections that had previously no content, it looks a little better now [[User:Astrokey44|Astrokey44]] 08:37, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
+::Could some of the existing links be turned into references? I've added to the summary sections that had previously no content, it looks a little better now. It probably is a good idea to put the prominent people into the article, although then where would you put the link to the [[Prominent indigenous Australians]] article? [[User:Astrokey44|Astrokey44]] 08:37, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
 :I'm impressed by this article.-[[User:Gadfium|gadfium]] 08:03, 18 November 2005 (UTC)