User talk:Balloonman

Unless otherwise specified, I will respond to you on the page where the conversation started, whether that is your talk page or mine.

Home Talk Contributions Blocks Deletions Moves Protections monobook.js Userspace

Archive box

{{Talkback|Balloonman|RE: }}

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update

No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

Query

For someone who is semi-retired, you're pretty active...like my father and father-in-law...

Since you're still around, I'd appreciate it if you could review User:BQZip01/RfA4 and give me some feedback. — BQZip01 — ^talk 22:19, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

yeah... I know pretty sad... I should just remove that banner shouldn't I... I'm such a failure (at being retired.)---I'm Spartacus! ^{NO! I'm Spartacus!} 22:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Review

Hey you reviewed me here and although I'm thinking of a possible late Summer RfA I'd still like to know what I've got to work on and if I improved from my last review. Thanks.--Giants27 ^T/C 02:29, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

CSD review

Hi, I noticed on ImperatorExercitus' RfA that you offered to do a CSD review. I was wondering if you could extend me that courtesy. KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Triple crown nom

Hello, can you please format your nomination at User:Durova/Triple crown winner's circle/Nominations according to the instructions? See the other entries on the list for a model. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 10:12, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Balloonman. You have new messages at MuffledThud's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Triple DYK

On 25 April, 2009, Did you know? was updated with facts from the articles A Christian Ministry in the National Parks, Warren Ost, and Christmas in August (Yellowstone), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 17:57, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

And that makes me eligible for the 25 DYK medal!---I'm Spartacus! ^{NO! I'm Spartacus!} 19:53, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Benjamin Barrick

Your input to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin barrick is solicited. Thanks!  Frank  |  talk  03:39, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppet case

Is there a sockpuppet case for User:Yourname? I have looked but I can not find one. --Abce2 (talk) 02:01, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

For the record I have increased Yourname's block to indef. Just as you felt the need to increase his block for attacking my talk page, I felt the need to increase his block for attacking your talk page. I have no confidence this user has any intention of productive editing here, in two weeks or two years. Chillum 03:38, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

No, but the its a case of a spade being called a spade. Chillum blocked Yourname this evening. I posted on Chillums page--and as far as I know, it's the first time we've ever communicated and the only point we have in common. We are also the two targets of the IP. Pretty obvious as to who is behind the vandalism.---I'm Spartacus! ^{NO! I'm Spartacus!} 06:13, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

I would not be surprised if User:Yourname has been here before and blocked before. He seemed very aware of how to game polices and AGF. This same person clearly has access to multiple IPs, likely through proxies. This person probably is a reoccurring character here. Chillum 13:25, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

The IP also hit DGG, who is also involved with Yourname.---I'm Spartacus! ^{NO! I'm Spartacus!} 19:03, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Prod

Is there a page that contains all articles that currently have Prod tags on? BigDunc^Talk 21:09, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes. CAT:PROD---I'm Spartacus! ^{NO! I'm Spartacus!} 21:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Great thanks I will have a scout at them see if anything of worth can be found. BigDunc^Talk 21:32, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yourname

File:Abu ghraib feces 06a.jpg

Notability of a village

Hi Spartacus could you point me in the direction of notability guidelines for a village thanks. BigDunc^Talk 18:46, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

There was a discussion here that failed to gain consensus. Villages often survive AfD and historically they have been deemed to be notable enough to exist on their own... but that does not mean that there is a policy/guideline on it, nor that the historical position is still accepted today.---I'm Spartacus! ^{NO! I'm Spartacus!} 18:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

So as it stands it is I exist therefore I am BigDunc^Talk 19:02, 29 April 2009 (UTC)