Jump to content

Talk:Intuit Mint: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 71.167.62.174 - "NPOV: "
Line 8: Line 8:
:::Go ahead and create them. :) --[[User:Eric1985|יהושועEric]] ([[User talk:Eric1985|talk]]) 21:02, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
:::Go ahead and create them. :) --[[User:Eric1985|יהושועEric]] ([[User talk:Eric1985|talk]]) 21:02, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


:I do not feel this is an ad. I was already aware of the site, but being unfamiliar with it I came here looking for a NPOV explaination of it's reliability/security. I agree information on other sites should be added. [[User:Yoda of Borg|Yoda of Borg]] ([[User talk:Yoda of Borg|talk]]) 19:28, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
::::I do not feel this is an ad. I was already aware of the site, but being unfamiliar with it I came here looking for a NPOV explaination of it's reliability/security. I agree information on other sites should be added. [[User:Yoda of Borg|Yoda of Borg]] ([[User talk:Yoda of Borg|talk]]) 19:28, 4 December 2008 (UTC)


Added the NPOV tag to the discussion about the security of the site, as it definitely doesn't read as neutral. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/32.97.110.142|32.97.110.142]] ([[User talk:32.97.110.142|talk]]) 17:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:::::Added the NPOV tag to the discussion about the security of the site, as it definitely doesn't read as neutral. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/32.97.110.142|32.97.110.142]] ([[User talk:32.97.110.142|talk]]) 17:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

::::::Definitely '''not''' an ad... [[User:Dmarquard|Dmarquard]] ([[User talk:Dmarquard|talk]]) 01:57, 5 May 2009 (UTC)


== NPOV ==
== NPOV ==

Revision as of 01:57, 5 May 2009

Potential for expansion

is this an ad? there should be articles on other similar websites like wesabe.com,or expensr.com and Geezeo.com to balance things out.98.195.185.125 15:55, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, there should be pages created for the other free personal finance type applications as well. --05runner (talk) 08:11, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds like a good idea. --Explodicle (T/C) 18:33, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Go ahead and create them. :) --יהושועEric (talk) 21:02, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I do not feel this is an ad. I was already aware of the site, but being unfamiliar with it I came here looking for a NPOV explaination of it's reliability/security. I agree information on other sites should be added. Yoda of Borg (talk) 19:28, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Added the NPOV tag to the discussion about the security of the site, as it definitely doesn't read as neutral. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.97.110.142 (talk) 17:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely not an ad... Dmarquard (talk) 01:57, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

I removed a paragraph with some pretty heavy POV about the security of the site, calling the creators "dishonest" and saying they "should" worry more about security. 74.92.148.250 (talk) 21:37, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The section on "security concerns" is really low on information of any kind. It mentions the association with Yodlee as if it were a negative thing - to me, if anything, that's a big plus for it's reputation... I'll be tempted to remove the security concerns section alltogether if some citations don't show up. JoshDuffMan (talk) 23:31, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand and agree with the need for NPOV, but I don't feel security information should be removed. I came here looking for a NPOV explaination/discussion of any security/reputability issues there might be. If someone familiar with "Yodlee" or any of mint.com's security holes could put information here, I think there should be a security section. Yoda of Borg (talk) 19:34, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I came here looking for unbiased information about the site's security, too. Yodlee#Privacy looks relevant, and a little scary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.62.174 (talk) 15:52, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

also [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.62.174 (talk) 16:00, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion Needs

Several sections including awards, finances, and security concerns need expansion. Please make an effort to help this article get better. --יהושועEric (talk) 22:15, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]