Talk:The Erotic Network: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
End RfC |
Willy turner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Pornproject|class=stub|importance=low}} |
|||
{{oldafd}} |
{{oldafd}} |
||
==Channels== |
==Channels== |
Revision as of 02:06, 5 May 2009
Pornography Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Channels
How does a list of channel names add anything to the article? How are they notable by themselves? Just seems spammy to me. Leuko 00:06, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- The network is a collection of PPV channels. Much like there are lists for XM channels, it's informative. It's sometimes hard to seperate spammy from informative, but having a list is hardly promotion..
Disclaimer
There should not be a disclaimer warning about adult content because every article has them at the bottom. However, I would like to ask if anyone disagrees.--Ainlina (talk) 11:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- No, of course there shouldn't be a specific warning. It's an encyclopedia, you have to expect such material here. It's the same case as WP:SPOILER. So#Why 11:09, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- Suggest removing that silly warning. Fletcher (talk) 23:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC)