Talk:Cementite: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Wimvandorst (talk | contribs) WP:Chem rating |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:I'm not convinced that you can assign clear [[oxidation number]]s to the atoms in this structure. You might as well assign 0 to all atoms and think of it as an alloy! --[[User:Itub|Itub]] 19:22, 14 November 2007 (UTC) |
:I'm not convinced that you can assign clear [[oxidation number]]s to the atoms in this structure. You might as well assign 0 to all atoms and think of it as an alloy! --[[User:Itub|Itub]] 19:22, 14 November 2007 (UTC) |
||
::See my formula. -lysdexia 11:03, 13 March 2008 (UTC) |
::See my formula. -lysdexia 11:03, 13 March 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Composition in Weight Ratios == |
|||
There is no mention of the composition in terms of percentage weight of carbon and iron for cementite in eutectoid structures. This is a pretty important number for applications in material science, the application with which information abut this substance is primarily concerned. I just think if people are looking up this article, it may very well be to find this value (its the reason I looked it up). Anyone have any thoughts regarding this? If no one has any complaints I'll add it within a day or two.[[User:Tracorn|Tracorn]] ([[User talk:Tracorn|talk]]) 07:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:21, 8 May 2009
Chemicals Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Charge of Fe?
Since carbide ion is 4- (when there is one carbon), what are the charges on the 3 Fe ions? Are they +1,+1 and +2? Or is there an error?RSido 01:25, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not convinced that you can assign clear oxidation numbers to the atoms in this structure. You might as well assign 0 to all atoms and think of it as an alloy! --Itub 19:22, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- See my formula. -lysdexia 11:03, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Composition in Weight Ratios
There is no mention of the composition in terms of percentage weight of carbon and iron for cementite in eutectoid structures. This is a pretty important number for applications in material science, the application with which information abut this substance is primarily concerned. I just think if people are looking up this article, it may very well be to find this value (its the reason I looked it up). Anyone have any thoughts regarding this? If no one has any complaints I'll add it within a day or two.Tracorn (talk) 07:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC)