Jump to content

User talk:72.79.221.240: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 6: Line 6:


{{uw-3rr|White privilege}}[[User:Anaxial|Anaxial]] ([[User talk:Anaxial|talk]]) 02:25, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
{{uw-3rr|White privilege}}[[User:Anaxial|Anaxial]] ([[User talk:Anaxial|talk]]) 02:25, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

== User notice: temporary 3RR block ==

<div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;">
==Regarding reversions[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=White_privilege&action=history] made on [[May 23]] [[2009]] to [[White privilege]]==
<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for {{#if:|a period of '''{{{time}}}'''|a short time}} in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for violating the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]{{#if:|&#32;at [[:{{{1}}}]]}}. Please be more careful to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] rather than engaging in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. {{#if:|[[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] ([[User talk:William M. Connolley|talk]]) 07:16, 23 May 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> The duration of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User:72.79.221.240&action=edit&section=new block] is 24 hours.

Please mark your reverts as such in your edit summaries by using "rv" or "revert" [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] ([[User talk:William M. Connolley|talk]]) 07:16, 23 May 2009 (UTC)</div>

Revision as of 07:16, 23 May 2009

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to White privilege has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jojhutton (talk) 01:06, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to White privilege. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 01:25, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at White privilege shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Anaxial (talk) 02:25, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Regarding reversions[1] made on May 23 2009 to White privilege

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
The duration of the block is 24 hours. Please mark your reverts as such in your edit summaries by using "rv" or "revert" William M. Connolley (talk) 07:16, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]