Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Boothroyd (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:19, 23 May 2009

Non-notable, lack of sourcing. Does not meet our present notability standards for inclusion as a WP:BLP. Last AFD was nearly four years ago. rootology/equality 19:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and the subject wants it that way. Syn 19:36, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Should, in my mind, be deleted immediately for his sake. Nathan^T 19:37, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; and per Nathan. Too many problems. Ncmvocalist (talk) 19:40, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The subject repeats his request made four years ago for deletion. DavidBoothroyd (talk) 20:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - although I am concerned with the nom and the timing of it, the subject has expressed interest in deletion and a google search found only a few entries, most no longer than two or three lines and from primary sources, with little news to justify keeping an article against the subject's will. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 20:14, 23 May 2009 edit DavidBoothroyd (talk \| contribs) 22 edits →David Boothroyd ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:19, 23 May 2009 edit undo Ottava Rima (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 20,327 edits →David Boothroyd Next edit →
Line 11:		Line 11:

	* '''Comment'''. The subject repeats his request made four years ago for deletion. [[User:DavidBoothroyd\|DavidBoothroyd]] ([[User talk:DavidBoothroyd\|talk]]) 20:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC)		* '''Comment'''. The subject repeats his request made four years ago for deletion. [[User:DavidBoothroyd\|DavidBoothroyd]] ([[User talk:DavidBoothroyd\|talk]]) 20:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

			* '''Delete''' - although I am concerned with the nom and the timing of it, the subject has expressed interest in deletion and a google search found only a few entries, most no longer than two or three lines and from primary sources, with little news to justify keeping an article against the subject's will. [[User:Ottava Rima\|Ottava Rima]] ([[User talk:Ottava Rima\|talk]]) 20:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC)