Talk:Telmex: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Jorgeblasio (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Jorgeblasio (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
On a side note, TelMex is not authorized and does not offer IPTV in Mexico, and certainly won't in the near future because of anti-trust issues. |
On a side note, TelMex is not authorized and does not offer IPTV in Mexico, and certainly won't in the near future because of anti-trust issues. |
||
[[User:Jorgeblasio|Jorgeblasio]] ([[User talk:Jorgeblasio|talk]]) 06:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:22, 1 June 2009
I've cleaned this up quite a bit. I would appreciate it if someone could check the facts, though; I didn't change much in terms of the facts presented. --Maw 22:57, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
Shouldn't telcel be listed too as a cellular provider in mexico?
TelMex shouldn't be listed as a mobile provider because it isn't. TelCel is a subsidiary of Grupo Carso which provides mobile telephony in México. América Móvil is another subsidiary of Grupo Carso, which operates in several central american and south american countries.
On a side note, TelMex is not authorized and does not offer IPTV in Mexico, and certainly won't in the near future because of anti-trust issues. Jorgeblasio (talk) 06:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC)