User talk:MBisanz: Difference between revisions
OhanaUnited (talk | contribs) →OTRS image on zh.wp: new section |
No edit summary |
||
Line 148: | Line 148: | ||
Please [http://zh.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=File%3AHkpclogo.jpg&diff=10196795&oldid=10181594 be careful] next time and don't change the license of a copyrighted image into GFDL/CC-BY-SA 3.0. We received a complaint email on OTRS from the Hong Kong government's Hong Kong Productivity Council (which is what that copyrighted image used on its article) questioning why you did that. [[User:OhanaUnited|<b><font color="#0000FF">OhanaUnited</font></b>]][[User talk:OhanaUnited|<b><font color="green"><sup>Talk page</sup></font></b>]] 17:49, 5 June 2009 (UTC) |
Please [http://zh.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=File%3AHkpclogo.jpg&diff=10196795&oldid=10181594 be careful] next time and don't change the license of a copyrighted image into GFDL/CC-BY-SA 3.0. We received a complaint email on OTRS from the Hong Kong government's Hong Kong Productivity Council (which is what that copyrighted image used on its article) questioning why you did that. [[User:OhanaUnited|<b><font color="#0000FF">OhanaUnited</font></b>]][[User talk:OhanaUnited|<b><font color="green"><sup>Talk page</sup></font></b>]] 17:49, 5 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
==Bots== |
|||
I saw that your on BAG and would like to create a bot please respond on my talk page. [[User:Normiad|NoRmIaD]] ([[User talk:Normiad|talk]]) 22:53, 5 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:53, 5 June 2009
Hi, This is just my talk page, feel free to leave any advice on my edits or ask for help on anything. If you feel I've abused my administrative or BAG powers, please see User:MBisanz/Recall for further instructions to request their removal.
This is MBisanz's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23Auto-archiving period: 7 days |
Index |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Category tracker for CAT:DFUI | |
---|---|
Category | # of items |
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files as of 28 July 2011 | 4 |
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files as of 30 July 2011 | 1 |
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files as of 2 August 2011 | 1 |
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files as of 3 August 2011 | 6 |
Updated: 08:20, 4 August 2011 (UTC) |
Deletion of Equinox Festival page
Hello, you formerly deleted the Equinox Festival page as lacking in notability when hundreds of sites came up with references to the festival. At this point the festival has generated an enormous amount of print and web based press including Timeout London, The Wire, Fortean Times, Reality Sandwich and many many others. Is it possible to reinstate this page? Please let me know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.11.191.253 (talk) 22:40, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Equinox Festival was clear, you would need to go to WP:DRV. MBisanz talk 03:19, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
List of LSAT Instruction Providers
Hi. You've requested deletion of List of LSAT Instruction Providers. You claim that it violates WP:NOTDIR. I don't see how. I've asked you to explain this assertion, but you apparently refuse to do so. I find this rather rude.--Patent Lawyer 001 (talk) 14:13, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- It is a list of all providers of a commercial service which I feel violates the "Wikipedia is not the yellow pages." part of WP:NOTDIR. MBisanz talk 03:33, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you for being more specific. However, I am still confused. If Wikipedia is not a yellow pages, then why does it contain this List_of_asset_management_firms, this List_of_South_Korean_retailers, this List of restaurant chains in the United States and many other lists of businesses categorized in [1] or [2]?? There does not appear to be any prohibition on lists of "providers of a commercial service". So there seems to be a problem with capricious enforcement of Wikipedia's rules. --Patent Lawyer 001 (talk) 14:13, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- The issue is that there are very few notable services and they could be covered in a category or in the main article, a list of mainly external links is not appropriate. Those other lists you link to are not the same style as the list in question. MBisanz talk 15:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Really? Did you look at List_of_South_Korean_retailers? It looks like the same style to me. --Patent Lawyer 001 (talk) 15:18, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- There are about 30+ links there, all to other Wikipedia articles. There are only two or three links on the LSAT list to other Wikipedia articles. MBisanz talk 15:20, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- If you look more closely, you will see that most of the links are to articles that don't exist. So... ?!?!? --Patent Lawyer 001 (talk) 16:17, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- There are about 30+ links there, all to other Wikipedia articles. There are only two or three links on the LSAT list to other Wikipedia articles. MBisanz talk 15:20, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Really? Did you look at List_of_South_Korean_retailers? It looks like the same style to me. --Patent Lawyer 001 (talk) 15:18, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- The issue is that there are very few notable services and they could be covered in a category or in the main article, a list of mainly external links is not appropriate. Those other lists you link to are not the same style as the list in question. MBisanz talk 15:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you for being more specific. However, I am still confused. If Wikipedia is not a yellow pages, then why does it contain this List_of_asset_management_firms, this List_of_South_Korean_retailers, this List of restaurant chains in the United States and many other lists of businesses categorized in [1] or [2]?? There does not appear to be any prohibition on lists of "providers of a commercial service". So there seems to be a problem with capricious enforcement of Wikipedia's rules. --Patent Lawyer 001 (talk) 14:13, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
AMiB RFAr
How was confidential information revealed to you? Hipocrite (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Emailed per request. Hipocrite (talk) 14:54, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- Per your email (for the record more than anything), it is very clear that neither you nor any checkuser violated the privacy policy in letter or spirit. Thank you for humoring my long-standing paranoia. Hipocrite (talk) 15:20, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Hkpclogo.jpg
I apologize for not knowing the relevant status, please add the following template if it's proven to be genuine.zh:Template:Cc-by-sa-3.0 or zh:Template:GFDL. Sorry for my pool english.regards,--Azeybs (talk) 00:18, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Your presence is cordially requested
On the MoS talk page. Please explain to what edit war your request refers. Where it says "Please insert subject of dispute," I'd be much obliged if you'd do the honors. Darkfrog24 (talk) 00:39, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello
Hello can be so kind to give me the template for that wikipedia signpost userbox? I tried to get the template by hitting "edit page" and copying from your user page to mine, but It gives me {{User:MBisanz/UBX}} and nothing else, and I went to {{User:MBisanz/UBX}} and couldn't find anything on the page, so do you mind lending me the template for that userbox? KMFDM FAN (talk) 21:34, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Try {{user Signpost}}. MBisanz talk 21:36, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
OTRS
Thanks for the invite, but I think I'll decline for now. I currently have too much going on here (plus the requests for Commons) to take on OTRS as well. Hopefully as some of my tasks here are completed, I'll take you up on the offer later. I appreciate you taking the time to add the OTRS permissions for the images I uploaded. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 18:42, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- From the editor: Browsing the archives
- Book review: Review of The Future of the Internet
- Scientology: End of Scientology arbitration brings blocks, media coverage
- News and notes: Picture of the Year, Wikipedia's first logo, Board elections, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Tamil Wikipedia, Internet Watch Foundation, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:40, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
terrorist article sock
Patty wack (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) is Jersay (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)?
See this. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 12:43, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Um, you linked me to a changing diff based on the latest revision to your page. Which diff did you mean? MBisanz talk 16:47, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- I HATE that... here, that should do it. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:01, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Looks the same to me. Suggesting an indef block. MBisanz talk 17:04, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
GATA
Hi. I don't think you should have deleted the GATA page. "Fringe" is a matter for opinion, but is
http://www.stockhouse.com/Columnists/2009/June/1/Raise-the-caution-flags-for-gold,-silver--Got-Gold
fringe? The GATA site is poorly covered by the mainstream media, but that's not an excuse for Wikipedia to ape them and also do a shitty job. If you have to look at one part of the GATA page for proof they're right (since that proof abounds) take a look at what Barrick Gold admitted in court about wanting Sovereign Immunity because they were working on behalf of Central Banks, just as GATA had alleged for years. If these people were "loons," they'd have gone away by now. They're not, so they haven't. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.188.3.239 (talk • contribs)
- I'm sorry you feel that way, please see WP:DRV. MBisanz talk 18:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
deleting file without warning
Can you please explain why file File talk:Bobbyhutcherson-joelocke-072007.jpg was suddenly deleted without warning? Can you please provide logical history. This is annoying - the file was used on various pages. --natz (talk) 20:34, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- The page was a meaingless page created by an IP that didn't have to do with the image. It was not the file page which is still at File:Bobbyhutcherson-joelocke-072007.jpg. MBisanz talk 20:49, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Deletion of physics article
A couple of days ago you deleted a page I created, without warning. I'm just really confused as to why this was done. The page had been scoured through by mathematicians and scientists on wikipedia many times and there had only ever been small issues with the article (such as a mistake in one of the equations by me and the wrong date in one of the attributed journals). The sudden deletion has obviously confused me a bit, and I would like to know how the conclusion of "hoax" was reached, on a page with journal and published scientific paper backing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anterior1 (talk • contribs) 01:10, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Deletion of Black Market Hero page
I was just wondering why this article was deleted as it is for an active band that is currently working on an album. The page will just end up recreated so what was the point in deleting it? --Mikebustraan (talk) 14:04, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- It still existed last I handled it, User:Michig was working on it. MBisanz talk 14:08, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
New Jersay sock
User:Patty wack has been vandalizing List of terrorist incidents, 2009 for the past month now. I'm 100% certain this user is another sock of User:Jersay: Patty wack, Somalia, Blue Jays, Terrorist incidents, banned Tuesday2009, same history, Jersay contrib. I know he'll just make a new account after I submit a sock report. Wikifan12345 (talk) 04:05, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Flag of Sweden
Can you please explain why you deleted File talk:Flag of Sweden.svg? That page contained valuable discussion on the sources for creating a correct reproduction of the flag (dimensions, color accuracy, etc). It is now no longer possible to follow the reasoning for the file edits in the file history section, which is essential to further improve the file. Please reconsider your decision. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiklas (talk • contribs) 12:15, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm, the version I deleted was
A blue flag that has a yellow vertical line on it and dezire wood wrote this
- There is an older version that references actual measurements, I'll restore that version. MBisanz talk 12:21, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Wow, you're fast! Thanks. Wiklas (talk) 12:24, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry to keep nagging about this. I noticed you restored a version from August 30, 2008 with one line of talk. Could you try finding a version after my last edit of the file on February 3, 2009? I remember there were contributions from several people, and I added my own. Alternatively, just inform me where I should go to request earlier version of discussion pages. After all, you only cleaned up some junk so you shouldn't have to deal with this. Thanks again! Wiklas (talk) 13:21, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, there aren't any other contributions after that date. Also, you have never edited that page, unless you edited it under an IP. Could you have it confused with a different page? MBisanz talk 13:27, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry to keep nagging about this. I noticed you restored a version from August 30, 2008 with one line of talk. Could you try finding a version after my last edit of the file on February 3, 2009? I remember there were contributions from several people, and I added my own. Alternatively, just inform me where I should go to request earlier version of discussion pages. After all, you only cleaned up some junk so you shouldn't have to deal with this. Thanks again! Wiklas (talk) 13:21, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, I see now. Apparently this Wikipedia page comes from Wikimedia. The discussion there is intact. My mistake, I'm very sorry for causing you trouble. Wiklas (talk) 13:48, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- No problem at all. Feel free to ask me anything, anytime. MBisanz talk 13:51, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello! I was just about to comment in this one. Anyway, might you reconsider allowing for a history undeletion (to see if anything can be merged) and redirect to Weyr, which was recently kept? Thanks! Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 13:16, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- I've emailed you a copy of the final version. MBisanz talk 13:30, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Hope you don't mind but I just un-deleted the talk page. It's linked from the top of the Talk:O RLY? page. The page gets several questions as to why the image doesn't exist and it's useful to be able to link to that discussion. Cheers. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 17:52, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Sure, I went ahead an added a template to keep it from getting caught in the database report. MBisanz talk 18:00, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
I posted a question for ya. - Dank (push to talk) 17:31, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
OTRS image on zh.wp
Please be careful next time and don't change the license of a copyrighted image into GFDL/CC-BY-SA 3.0. We received a complaint email on OTRS from the Hong Kong government's Hong Kong Productivity Council (which is what that copyrighted image used on its article) questioning why you did that. OhanaUnitedTalk page 17:49, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Bots
I saw that your on BAG and would like to create a bot please respond on my talk page. NoRmIaD (talk) 22:53, 5 June 2009 (UTC)