Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Brad Polard (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Brad Polard (talk | contribs) Adding details to report |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
:{{AIV|i}} [[User:Mifter|Mifter]] ([[User talk:Mifter|talk]]) 18:18, 7 June 2009 (UTC) |
:{{AIV|i}} [[User:Mifter|Mifter]] ([[User talk:Mifter|talk]]) 18:18, 7 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
* {{IPvandal| 71.37.54.74}} Vandalism [[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=295029721| here]]. And then after that posted two attacks on my page, [[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Brad_Polard&diff=next&oldid=295032940| this one]] and [[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Brad_Polard&diff=next&oldid=295033134| here]]. Saying "look like a fool" is completely unacceptable |
* {{IPvandal| 71.37.54.74}} Vandalism [[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=295029721| here]]. And then after that posted two attacks on my page, [[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Brad_Polard&diff=next&oldid=295032940| this one]] and [[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Brad_Polard&diff=next&oldid=295033134| here]]. Saying "look like a fool" is completely unacceptable, vandalized after final warning. Please suggest soonest. --[[User:Brad Polard|Brad Polard]] ([[User talk:Brad Polard|talk]]) 20:10, 7 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:12, 7 June 2009
Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.
Important!
- The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
- Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
- The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
- If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
* {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
- Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
- Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
- This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
This page was last updated at 07:45 on 25 December 2024 (UTC).
if it is out of date.
Alerts
- JustSomeoneNo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:57, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. PhilKnight (talk) 07:07, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Kamalhasaan69 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:41, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- 92.14.240.8 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Multiple unconstructive edits to various articles 'The Ninjalemming'' 18:04, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. Mifter (talk) 18:18, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- 71.37.54.74 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism [here]. And then after that posted two attacks on my page, [this one] and [here]. Saying "look like a fool" is completely unacceptable, vandalized after final warning. Please suggest soonest. --Brad Polard (talk) 20:10, 7 June 2009 (UTC)