Talk:Psychedelic pop: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
rate |
Kohoutek1138 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|class=start |
|class=start |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Merge == |
|||
''Oppose''; I don't think Psychedelic pop and Psychedelic rock should be merged. The two are distinct and different genres; in essence they are as distinctly different as Pop and Rock are, it just happens to be the psychedelic aspect of those genres that we're talking about. As such, merging the two would be like saying that Black Sabbath operate in the same genre as Herman's Hermits. There's a world of difference between Psychedelic rock bands (like the Blue Cheer for example) and The World of Oz (who were Psychedelic pop) for example. I do, however, agree that there seems to be a lot of crossover and contradiction in this and other related articles, and that they all need a good clean up. [[User:Kohoutek1138|Kohoutek1138]] 14:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:32, 21 June 2009
Music/Music genres task force Start‑class | |||||||
|
Merge
Oppose; I don't think Psychedelic pop and Psychedelic rock should be merged. The two are distinct and different genres; in essence they are as distinctly different as Pop and Rock are, it just happens to be the psychedelic aspect of those genres that we're talking about. As such, merging the two would be like saying that Black Sabbath operate in the same genre as Herman's Hermits. There's a world of difference between Psychedelic rock bands (like the Blue Cheer for example) and The World of Oz (who were Psychedelic pop) for example. I do, however, agree that there seems to be a lot of crossover and contradiction in this and other related articles, and that they all need a good clean up. Kohoutek1138 14:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)