User talk:Ronhjones: Difference between revisions
Delivering Vol. 5, Issue 26 of Wikipedia Signpost (BOT) |
Artifountain (talk | contribs) →Antonio Valencia: new section |
||
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
<small>Delivered by [[User:SoxBot|SoxBot]] ([[User talk:SoxBot|talk]]) at 02:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)</small> |
<small>Delivered by [[User:SoxBot|SoxBot]] ([[User talk:SoxBot|talk]]) at 02:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)</small> |
||
== Antonio Valencia == |
|||
Thank you for contributing to the fight against Wikipedia vandalism, most recently on [[Antonio Valencia]]'s page. Your work is appreciated and your message to the perpetrator clear and professional. Good luck in future edits. |
|||
BTW it would be great if Valencia got a bit more depth in his article. Comparing his article to others in [[Manchester United]], I noticed that it is somewhat of a stub. Please contribute if you can. Thank you. |
Revision as of 20:16, 30 June 2009
Hi there! To keep the flow of conversations, I like to keep threads on one page where possible. So, if you post a message here, I'll probably respond to it here. Conversely, if I post a message on your talk page, you can respond there if you wish; since I've edited your talk page I'll have it on my watchlist. Thanks!
If you wish to contact me privately you can email me
- Book review :Review of Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes
- News and notes: License update, Google Translate, GLAM conference, Paid editing
- Wikipedia in the news: In the Google News, London Review of Books, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Chemistry
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Reply to Tornado warning
No problem. Also, it's not a problem with a javascript. It appears that the last unvandalized revision had a blacklisted link which won't let us revert to the last version. Elockid (talk) 23:34, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
re: Mosley
I feel my edit on this page summed the subject up in a clear and concise way...
Seriously, I apologise for the vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.100.165.121 (talk) 23:18, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Some may think your comments were correct. However, we cannot voice such opinions here. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Tatsuma (Farker)
If you will read some of the work this one man has done, it is worthy of notation. Please let wiki be the record of his selfless actions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gwpfarker (talk • contribs) 23:33, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- If he is that good, then you won'y have any trouble finding WP:RS for the article. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:37, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Jonny Corndawg
I removed the speedy tag from Jonny Corndawg as the article has a reference from a weekly newspaper. -- Eastmain (talk) 23:37, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Special:ShortPages never includes redirects. So things like this aren't necessary. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 18:54, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Dear Ronhjones, I have reverted your changes to File:4-AcO-DMT.svg as you got the structure wrong, the transparency was messed up, and there were CH3 added. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chemistry/Structure_drawing, especially, please do not try to create or manipulate chemical structures without a molecule editor. Cacycle (talk) 04:31, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'm half confused. I see I put the side chin on the 2, not the 3 position - my error, sorry. As for the drawing - well it was done in a molecule editor (SymyxDraw - which is the current replacement for IsisDraw, MDL was bought by Elsevier, which split off part of the business as Symyx). As for the methyls - well I added them, as last time I did a drawing it was changed because there was no methyls... User_talk:Benjah-bmm27#Tetramethylammonium_chloride, so this time I put them in. Obviously you can't please all the people all of the time. Hopefully someone will make a definitive decision sometime. Ronhjones (Talk) 00:05, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- Special report:Study of vandalism survival times
- News and notes: Wikizine, video editing, milestones
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia impacts town's reputation, assorted blogging
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:19, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
I don't know what I'm doing!
I just barely got that comment on there lol... how do I make a new section for my comment on the talk page? It doesn't fit in any of the ones with an edit button.
- Every page has a talk page (see tabs at top of page). So you need to open the talk page Talk:Tara Maclay, and the forth tab along the top says "New Section" - click that, add a section title, add your text in the edit box, and please add 4 tildes ~~~~ at the end of your text to show who you are Ronhjones (Talk) 23:02, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- News and notes: Jackson's death, new data center, more
- Wikipedia in the news: Google News Support, Wired editor plagiarizes Wikipedia, Rohde's kidnapping, Michael Jackson
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Antonio Valencia
Thank you for contributing to the fight against Wikipedia vandalism, most recently on Antonio Valencia's page. Your work is appreciated and your message to the perpetrator clear and professional. Good luck in future edits.
BTW it would be great if Valencia got a bit more depth in his article. Comparing his article to others in Manchester United, I noticed that it is somewhat of a stub. Please contribute if you can. Thank you.