Jump to content

User talk:Coren: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 6 thread(s) (older than 3d) to User talk:Coren/Archives/2009/June.
Line 30: Line 30:
::... and what ''is'' it with you and boobs anyways? :-) &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Coren|Coren]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:Coren|(talk)]]</sup> 13:07, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
::... and what ''is'' it with you and boobs anyways? :-) &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Coren|Coren]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:Coren|(talk)]]</sup> 13:07, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
:::heh... well I just can't get enough of 'em! - actually there's just something wonderful about the way 'gigantic boob' scans - always raises a smile for me! (yeah, this probably says heaps about me that's probably better left unexplored!) - there's really no rush on this one, I won't be involved again personally for another six months, though I will be witheringly sarcastic if the problem remains (or at least try to be!) - hope 'moving day' went well for you, and hope you find a fruitful solution :-) [[User:Privatemusings|Privatemusings]] ([[User talk:Privatemusings|talk]]) 12:46, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
:::heh... well I just can't get enough of 'em! - actually there's just something wonderful about the way 'gigantic boob' scans - always raises a smile for me! (yeah, this probably says heaps about me that's probably better left unexplored!) - there's really no rush on this one, I won't be involved again personally for another six months, though I will be witheringly sarcastic if the problem remains (or at least try to be!) - hope 'moving day' went well for you, and hope you find a fruitful solution :-) [[User:Privatemusings|Privatemusings]] ([[User talk:Privatemusings|talk]]) 12:46, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

== Peter Bradley-Fulgoni ==

Hi Coren,

I'm sorry you've come to the decision of deleting the article I've made. I actually know Peter Bradley-Fulgoni himself very well and had his personal permission and copyright to write this article. He is the one who holds the copyright to the information on soundtechniques.tv, and as you can see from that website, there is no "copyright" written anywhere. It is his CV which he has written himself, and soundtechniques.tv bought it off him as a deal. I'm doing him a favour, and this article would become more accurate and have more reliable sources throughout time. It will soon be created in Russian and Italian as well, just for your information. Could you possibly not generate the automatic message the article in the future, I would be extremely grateful. Thank you and sorry for causing the fuss!

[[User:Wtjulianchan|Wtjulianchan]] ([[User talk:Wtjulianchan|talk]]) 16:06, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:06, 1 July 2009

Archives
2015
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec
2016
JanFebMar
AprMayJun
JulAugSep
OctNovDec

"Work it out on the talk page"???

Re your protection of autofellatio, yes you were indeed quite correct to sprotect the article, but did you actually read the revisions? Your edit summary leads me to believe that you didn't The two IPs were trying to insult each other using vandalism to do it. This wasn't an edit war it was me trying to stop the article from being vandalised. I'#m sure that doesn't need talk page discussion, unless there's a new dictate I'm not aware of... --WebHamster 00:09, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Err, not that I know of.  :-) I saw repeated changes to/around the image and repeated reversions— given the regular edit warring over the images on this article, I jumped to the conclusion that it was about the image again as opposed to random vandalism. — Coren (talk) 01:58, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to say

That the spaceref.com stuff detected by your bot is NASA source. NASA is US Government and their text are PD. Hektor (talk) 22:07, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

a boob-ish gamble

G'day C - hope you're good 'n all that :-) - I thought I'd swing by and take a bit of a gamble! As July rushes upon us, and the first half of good old 2009 is down the wiki plughole, I wonder if you might be able to fix up the GFDL compliance at Giovanni di Stefano - an article I've promised not to go near for the whole year (perhaps the wiki gods may forgive this one transgression? probably not, but never mind!).

The article was a collaborative work at the point it was summarily deleted and re-created by Fred back in December (was it 07? Good lord!) - I've mentioned this on wiki quite a few times, and either I'm a gigantic boob for bringing it up again when it was fixed ages ago (hand on heart, I haven't checked - that either makes me wise or lazy, or both?), or those who have been aware of it are gigantic boobs for taking an age to enact what should be a very easy thing to resolve. The final option, of course, is that you become aware of the pretty obvious GFDL violation, and do nothing about it - thus preserving the boobage for yourself. Any friendly passing admin could fix this up in pretty short order, though all should be aware that this is a pretty sensitive area, and you may be sued for 50 million euros. If that's a good enough reason to violate the GFDL (maybe!) then all we need to do is say so.... :-) Privatemusings (talk) 07:16, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be glad to give a hand, but it may have to wait until Thursday. July 1st is traditionally "moving day" here in Quebec, and I've got a number of tenants moving in and out of flats that will occupy much of my attention today and tomorrow. I will take a quick peek now, though, and see if something can be done sooner rather than later. — Coren (talk) 13:06, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
... and what is it with you and boobs anyways?  :-) — Coren (talk) 13:07, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
heh... well I just can't get enough of 'em! - actually there's just something wonderful about the way 'gigantic boob' scans - always raises a smile for me! (yeah, this probably says heaps about me that's probably better left unexplored!) - there's really no rush on this one, I won't be involved again personally for another six months, though I will be witheringly sarcastic if the problem remains (or at least try to be!) - hope 'moving day' went well for you, and hope you find a fruitful solution :-) Privatemusings (talk) 12:46, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Bradley-Fulgoni

Hi Coren,

I'm sorry you've come to the decision of deleting the article I've made. I actually know Peter Bradley-Fulgoni himself very well and had his personal permission and copyright to write this article. He is the one who holds the copyright to the information on soundtechniques.tv, and as you can see from that website, there is no "copyright" written anywhere. It is his CV which he has written himself, and soundtechniques.tv bought it off him as a deal. I'm doing him a favour, and this article would become more accurate and have more reliable sources throughout time. It will soon be created in Russian and Italian as well, just for your information. Could you possibly not generate the automatic message the article in the future, I would be extremely grateful. Thank you and sorry for causing the fuss!

Wtjulianchan (talk) 16:06, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]