User talk:Dabomb87/Archive 11: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 3 thread(s) from User talk:Dabomb87. |
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) from User talk:Dabomb87. |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Hey Dabomb, I withdrew nomination of 4 minutes and applied for a PR. Well can you give your inputs there regarding what more can be improved? <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|--''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 09:30, 2 July 2009 (UTC) |
Hey Dabomb, I withdrew nomination of 4 minutes and applied for a PR. Well can you give your inputs there regarding what more can be improved? <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|--''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 09:30, 2 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Oops! == |
|||
Thanks for transluding that one. I completely forgot! :) '''[[User:IMatthew|<span style="font-family:Century Gothic;color:#000080">iMatthew</span>]] <span style="font-family:Century Gothic;color:#007BA7">[[User_talk:IMatthew|<span style="font-family:Century Gothic;color:#007BA7"><sup>talk</sup>]]</span>''' at 22:28, 2 July 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Incentive system for reviewers, again == |
|||
For [[WT:FAR]]. To be frank, I think there is 0% chance that the average detail of reviews will decrease. '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<font color="GoldenRod">YellowMonkey</font>]]''' (''[[User_talk:YellowMonkey|<font color="#FA8605">cricket calendar poll!</font>]]'') [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Paid_editing#Statement_by_YellowMonkey|paid editing=POV]] 03:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:31, 6 July 2009
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Dabomb87. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | → | Archive 15 |
Master of Orion II GA review
Hi, Dabomb87, thanks for closing this (as a pass). I've left a message at the original reviewer's Talk page. --Philcha (talk) 18:34, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Rumford Prize
Can you explain your oppose a little? I'm going on vacation, doubtful I can access the Internet; I've asked Ceranthor to finish the FLC, if he accepts can you please send him the same PDFs you send me? Thank you.ResMar 19:46, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- I'll accept here, for convenience sake. ceranthor 19:49, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Okey dokey, I've resolved all the non-content concerns, could you send me the e-mail, too? ceranthor 20:03, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- OK, I'll send you a Wikipedia email first. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:15, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Okey dokey, I've resolved all the non-content concerns, could you send me the e-mail, too? ceranthor 20:03, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
4 Minutes
Hey Dabomb, I withdrew nomination of 4 minutes and applied for a PR. Well can you give your inputs there regarding what more can be improved? --Legolas (talk2me) 09:30, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Oops!
Thanks for transluding that one. I completely forgot! :) iMatthew talk at 22:28, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Incentive system for reviewers, again
For WT:FAR. To be frank, I think there is 0% chance that the average detail of reviews will decrease. YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) paid editing=POV 03:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC)