NASA Open Source Agreement: Difference between revisions
m I think "date" field would refer to publishing date? I doubt the site has changed on the same day as it was retrieved here. Also, I rechecked it and thus updated the date. BTW Do we really need [f]? |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|accessdate=June 17, 2009 |
|accessdate=June 17, 2009 |
||
}}</ref> |
}}</ref> |
||
| GPL compatible = No |
| GPL compatible = No<ref name="fsflist"></ref> |
||
| copyleft = No |
| copyleft = No |
||
| linking = Yes? |
| linking = Yes? |
||
Revision as of 00:34, 7 July 2009
 NASA logo | |
| Author | NASA |
|---|---|
| Latest version | 1.3 |
| Publisher | NASA |
| Published | ? |
| SPDX identifier | NASA-1.3 |
| Debian FSG compatible | No[1] |
| FSF approved | No[2] |
| OSI approved | Yes |
| GPL compatible | No[2] |
| Copyleft | No |
| Linking from code with a different licence | Yes? |
| Website | opensource |
The NASA Open Source Agreement (NOSA) is an OSI-approved software license. The United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) releases some software (such as NASA World Wind) under this license. The NOSA allows NASA to increase software quality and accelerate development by involving a broader community in code review and contribution. It is also hoped that open sourced NASA software will maximize awareness and impact of NASA research, particularly in support of NASA's education mission.[3]
Publication of open source software fits in with Agency functions outlined under the National Aeronautics and Space Act, that is, to "provide for the widest practicable and appropriate dissemination of information concerning its activities and the results thereof."[4]
The NASA Open Source Agreement was accepted as an open source license. The Free Software Foundation raises issue with the following clause:
G. Each Contributor represents that that its Modification is believed
to be Contributor's original creation and does not violate any existing agreements, regulations, statutes or rules, and further that Contributor has sufficient rights to grant the rights conveyed by this
Agreement.
The FSF believes that “[f]ree software development depends on combining code from third parties”, and because of this requirement that changes be your “original creation” the license is not a free software licence.[2]
See also
References
- ^ Debian package description for NASA World Wind. Retrieved on May 14, 2009.
- ^ a b c "NASA Open Source Agreement". Various Licenses and Comments about Them. Free Software Foundation. Retrieved June 17, 2009.
- ^ "NASA Open Source Software". Retrieved January 23, 2008.
- ^ "The National Aeronautics and Space Act". Retrieved January 23, 2008.
External links
- Text of the NASA Open Source Software Agreement in various formats
- Ames Research Center open source software
- Goddard Spaceflight Center open source software
 | This law-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |