Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Living With Fibromyalgia

Living With Fibromyalgia

Living With Fibromyalgia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

WP:NF no RS for this film, only reference is dead link and i can not find any independent sources. I think it is advertisement for a film selling on Amazon but it is not reviewed in any RS. RetroS1mone talk 04:11, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 11:27, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
• Weak keep - there are some reviews available, but mostly of the blog sort. Bearian (talk) 18:33, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
• Keep - Although there are lots of reviews and referrals to this video none are major sources. On the other hand this video is unique in the world of FM and is highly thought of as a documentary in its own right. A video like this will always have a minority interest but within it's small world it does seem to be notable if only for the fact that no-one else has done anything like it. --WebHamster 20:08, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

* Delete Fails WP:NF. Blogs aren't reliable sources and you can find mention of anything somewhere in a blog. BigDunc 20:14, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

• SRONG Keep Award-winning docmentary film, and first feature-length of its kind, with sourcing available that are not blogs. And of all the minutae (sorry) that quite often finds its way into these pages through the "notability" of headline and hype, this article truly serves to improve the project and inform readers about a notable subject that impinges on many lives. Not to spout WP:WAX, but an encyclopedia that has articles on consumer fast foods should gladly encourage inclusion of such encyclopedic articles that serve the world community as a whole. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 02:19, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
• Keep: It as an award winner. Passes WP:NF. Iowateen (talk) 14:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
• Keep Checked out the award it has won it appears very few of the films that win at this awards have articles nevertheless change my vote. BigDunc 14:37, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

comment, that is probaly BC the Houston International Film Festival has ~ 200 award categories, it gave 872 awards in 2008, top to bottom Grand Award, Special Jury Award, Platinum Remi, Gold Remi, Silver Remi, Bronze Remi. 2008, it was 9 Grand Awards, top prize, 67 Special Jury Awards, and 199 Platinum Remis. There are 3 Documentary categories and 7 documentaries got Special Jury award and 7 got platinum Remis. This film was one from 3 films that got a platinum Remi in it's documentary catagory, after two that got Special Jury Award. So this film, at one independent film festival was in the top 14 documentaries and top 275 awards. RetroS1mone talk 02:49, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

• Delete "as one of 23 documentaries to receive awards at the festival." & a minor festival at that. Retrosimone is rightthat this is not a significant award, and there are no other indicationjs of notability.DGG (talk) 04:51, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  • With over 4500 entries in multiple catagories. Award-winning documentaries accounted for only .05% of the total and Plantinum Remi (1st place) winning documentaries accounted for only .01% of the total. Must have been something special about them. the WorldFest-Houston International Film Festival is a notable festival now gearing up for its 43rd such event. With respects, since WP:NF specifically states "standards have not yet been established to define a major award", I am quite happy to not infer something guideline does not mandate and so accept this honor by that festival as indicative of the film's notability and the value of the article in improving Wikipedia and informing readers. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 08:35, 16 July 2009 (UTC)