User talk:Mysdaao

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Images

Hi it's me again. Do you know what wikepedia policy is on images on talk pages? I do use my talk page to practice on and images I used and then put on the article remain in the article but disappear from my talk page although the link is there. The reason I ask was the editors do not like original research on an article page but what about on talk pages with the images. My problem is the only reference I can find are visual on youtube. Stupid as it may sound this is for Toronado (Zorro's horse). I am tempted to put the images on the talk pages there.REVUpminster (talk) 18:03, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Images are allowed on talk pages, both article talk pages and user talk pages, if they are free. Non-free images, which are copyrighted images without a free content license, can only be used in an article for encyclopedic purposes. If the images you plan to use are free, you can put them on your user talk page to work on content or on an article talk page to discuss improving the article. But if they're non-free, they can't be used in that way. These policies can be read at Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy (see #9), Wikipedia:User page#Images on user pages, and Wikipedia:Image use policy#Image queuing.

As an added suggestion, if you do plan to work on article content on your user page, it is best to create a subpage by following the directions at Wikipedia:User page#Creating user subpages, and working on it on the subpage.

Please let me know if there are any more questions. Thanks! --Mysdaao ^talk 20:10, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Thankyou.. I get the aspirin out before going on. TV and Film are a nightmare on wikipedia to comply with the letter of the lawREVUpminster (talk) 13:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. It gets easier over time so I hope you don't get too frustrated with it. --Mysdaao ^talk 14:50, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Content break

Mysdaao

is there a content break, like when you have a content then we talk about a different subject but on the same topic.

When an article has content on a different subject under the same topic, it is best to use a subsection. After the main section heading, which uses the formatting ==Section title==, create a subsection with the formatting ===Subsection title===, which uses three = on both sides instead of two. You can read more about how they work at Help:Section. Please do not use the a horizontal rule (----) for this because it is deprecated, as explained at Wikipedia:Layout#Horizontal rule.

In the future, please sign your comments on talk pages by adding ~~~~ at the end. This will identify that you wrote the comment and the date and time you wrote it. All of this and more is explained at Wikipedia:Signatures.

Please let me know if there are any more questions. Thanks! --Mysdaao ^talk 13:06, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Beyond the milky way

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Beyond the milky way, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Redirecting to page which contains material already covered in numerous other articles

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jdrewitt (talk) 15:38, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletions apply to articles, lists, and disambiguation pages, but not redirects as described in the policy at Wikipedia:Proposed deletion#How it works. Redirects may be marked for speedy deletion or listed at Redirects for discussion. In the case of these two redirects, it looks like you want the redirects deleted now because you believe the article they redirect to should be deleted. You should wait to see if Beyond The Milky Way is deleted. If it is, you can request a speedy deletion of the redirects under criteria G8 by placing {{db-redirnone}} on the redirects' pages. Thank you. --Mysdaao ^talk 18:20, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Beyond the Milky Way

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Beyond the Milky Way, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Redirecting to page which contains material already covered in numerous other articles

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jdrewitt (talk) 15:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Please see response in section above. --Mysdaao ^talk 18:20, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

BIG MEANNNIEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111111111111

BIG MEANNNIEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111111111111 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theman52 (talk • contribs) 12:19, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Your edits constitute vandalism. And in response to your message to me, I ARAE HIPPYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111111111111111111 --Mysdaao ^talk 12:39, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry

I am sorry for my continued vandalism of Wikipedia. I got carried away. It won't happen again. Wikipedia is the essential source for information on the internet, so I realise how difficult it must be for you guys to keep up with vandals such as myself. I genuinely feel bad now, and I sincerely apologise.

However, I noticed that my one constructive post, on the Motherwell FC page under the section "Return to Europe", has been deleted. Is there any chance this could be corrected?