Talk:Nursehound: Difference between revisions
Epipelagic (talk | contribs) copyright explanation |
+GAN, assign importances |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Banners| |
{{WikiProject Banners| |
||
{{WikiProject Sharks|nested=yes}} |
{{WikiProject Sharks|importance=low|nested=yes}} |
||
{{Fishproject|nested=yes|class = start}} |
{{Fishproject|nested=yes|importance=low|class = start}} |
||
{{WikiProject Oceans|nested=yes}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{GA nominee|04:40, 17 July 2009 (UTC)|page=1| subtopic=Biology and medicine|status=}} |
|||
== Copyright problem == |
== Copyright problem == |
Revision as of 04:40, 17 July 2009
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Nursehound is currently a Biology and medicine good article nominee. Nominated by an unspecified nominator at 04:40, 17 July 2009 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.
|
Copyright problem
This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter, here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you. --Geronimo20 (talk) 05:24, 10 April 2009 (UTC)