Jump to content

Talk:Her Majesty's Wizard: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 83.166.11.82 - "Insanity?: new section"
EarwigBot I (talk | contribs)
m Bot: EarwigBot I Task 6: Adding timestamp and reviewer to undated accepted AfC submission (Type A).
Line 4: Line 4:
|fantasy-task-force=yes
|fantasy-task-force=yes
}}
}}
{{WPAFC|class=start}}
{{WPAFC|ts=20070826115304|reviewer=Graeme Bartlett|class=start}}


== Insanity? ==
== Insanity? ==

Revision as of 08:47, 19 July 2009

WikiProject iconNovels: Fantasy Redirect‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This redirect is supported by Fantasy task force.
WikiProject iconArticles for creation Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This redirect was accepted on 26 August 2007 by reviewer Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs).

Insanity?

"Any student of Catholicism will quickly see their studies reflected in the lives and actions of the characters." Has Wikipedia been taken over by christians? This article needs to be seriously rewritten to adhere to quality standards. This is not a objective summary of the book. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.166.11.82 (talk) 07:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]