Talk:NProtect GameGuard: Difference between revisions
DanielPharos (talk | contribs) m Added to Computing wikiproject |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
It seems like that GameGuard doesn't conflict with NetLimiter anymore. This is using Vista x64 |
It seems like that GameGuard doesn't conflict with NetLimiter anymore. This is using Vista x64 |
||
[[User:DarkStarZN|DarkStarZN]] ([[User talk:DarkStarZN|talk]]) 07:05, 17 December 2008 (UTC) |
[[User:DarkStarZN|DarkStarZN]] ([[User talk:DarkStarZN|talk]]) 07:05, 17 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
This seems to be correct, I run NetLimiter 2.0.10.1 just fine with GameGuard. I also run SpeedFan without issues. --[[Special:Contributions/208.102.90.111|208.102.90.111]] ([[User talk:208.102.90.111|talk]]) 18:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Game Guard will not work on Windows 7 Beta. |
Game Guard will not work on Windows 7 Beta. |
Revision as of 18:25, 26 July 2009
Computing: Software Unassessed | |||||||||||||
|
Previous problems of nProtect GameGuard with Windows Vista and AVG have been resolved. 210.217.175.101 (talk) 07:07, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
The sentence regarding the Error 114 was removed due to the link to the FAQ page where the Error can be resolved. Kevinkph85 (talk) 08:02, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
The previous problem with Panda Security has been resolved. Kevinkph85 (talk) 00:31, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
To make flyff run in ubuntu, i used: VirtualBox Drivers for the video card Directx 9.0 Directx sdk --Manatax (talk) 19:23, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
It seems like that GameGuard doesn't conflict with NetLimiter anymore. This is using Vista x64 DarkStarZN (talk) 07:05, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
This seems to be correct, I run NetLimiter 2.0.10.1 just fine with GameGuard. I also run SpeedFan without issues. --208.102.90.111 (talk) 18:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Game Guard will not work on Windows 7 Beta. DarkStarZN (talk) 12:32, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Can someone clarify what B2B2C is? 144.32.58.227 (talk) 18:56, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
I've tested a lot of things that its supposed to conflict with (for instance Razer mouse, launching apps from Steam) and nothing seemed to happen - everything seemed to work just fine. Also - has some reputable security organization actually analyzed this program and determined it is a rootkit? I've searched all over, but haven't found anything.Skuld-Chan (talk) 08:18, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- No need. The article states quite clearly that it hooks API calls and actively manipulates them to hide its processes. That is the definition of a rootkit. So as long as those statements are true, no further analysis is needed. --DanielPharos (talk) 12:58, 23 July 2009 (UTC)