Jump to content

User talk:203.199.213.66: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Message regarding Truss article using MWT
Formal warning.
Line 70: Line 70:


[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia, {{#if:Truss|as you did at [[:Truss]],}} you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> [[User:Piano non troppo|Piano non troppo]] ([[User talk:Piano non troppo|talk]]) 06:40, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia, {{#if:Truss|as you did at [[:Truss]],}} you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> [[User:Piano non troppo|Piano non troppo]] ([[User talk:Piano non troppo|talk]]) 06:40, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

<b>You need to understand that to contribute to Wikipedia, you must follow the rules established by the Wikimedia Foundation. This is not a forum, where anybody is free to say whatever they want. Reviewing your edits, many of them have problems. You express your personal opinion, delete material, and add politically charged commentary. This is a formal warning. You are only two or three edits from having your computer blocked from editing.</b> [[User:Piano non troppo|Piano non troppo]] ([[User talk:Piano non troppo|talk]]) 06:43, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:43, 27 July 2009

Note

Older warnings archived here. ~ Riana 11:55, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

6 July 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Clinical trial. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~ Riana 11:54, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to MOSFET, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KJS77Talk 05:10, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

16 February 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Islam in India. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Angelo De La Paz (talk) 09:14, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Deobandi. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:19, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Rahmatullah Kairanawi has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Prashanthns (talk) 10:35, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Anti-Hindi agitations. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: agitations&diff=next&oldid=224476849 link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Heisenbergthechemist (talk) 06:02, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the WIKE page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. 11:27, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Gromov's compactness theorem (geometry). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BigDuncTalk 14:22, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Gromov's compactness theorem (geometry). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. StaticGull  Talk  15:10, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Youth for Equality has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. RainbowOfLight Talk 08:23, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ghajini (2008 film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Maddie (formerly Ashbey) 13:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Ghajini (2008 film). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Leujohn (talk) 13:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary for your edits. Thank you. Leujohn (talk) 13:09, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page 1985 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Skarebo (talk) 09:45, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page 1985. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Skarebo (talk) 09:51, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to December 30

Dear 203.199.213.66,
Some of your edits on the page December 30 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 13:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page SPIC MACAY has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): googlepages\.com (links: http://spicmacay.hcu.googlepages.com/).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:28, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Zeitgeist, the Movie, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sophus Bie (talk) 10:42, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Your edits to November 10

Dear 203.199.213.66,
Some of your edits on the page November 10 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 12:09, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BLP

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Ram Charan Teja. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. — Deontalk 16:02, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Truss, you will be blocked from editing. Piano non troppo (talk) 06:40, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You need to understand that to contribute to Wikipedia, you must follow the rules established by the Wikimedia Foundation. This is not a forum, where anybody is free to say whatever they want. Reviewing your edits, many of them have problems. You express your personal opinion, delete material, and add politically charged commentary. This is a formal warning. You are only two or three edits from having your computer blocked from editing. Piano non troppo (talk) 06:43, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]