Affine logic: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:09, 27 July 2009

Affine logic is a substructural logic whose proof theory rejects the structural rule of contraction. It can also be characterized as linear logic with weakening.

The name "affine logic" is associated with linear logic, to which is differs by allowing the weakening rule. Jean-Yves Girard introduced the name as part of the geometry of interaction semantics of linear logic, which characterises linear logic in terms of linear algebra; here he alludes to affine transformations on vector spaces^[1].

The logic predated linear logic. V. N. Grishin used this logic in 1974^[2], after observing that Russell's paradox cannot be derived in a set theory without contraction, even with an unbounded comprehension axiom^[3]. Likewise, the logic formed the basis of a decidable subtheory of predicate logic, called 'Direct logic' (Ketonen & Wehrauch, 1984; Ketonen & Bellin, 1989).

Affine logic can be embedded into linear logic by rewriting the affine arrow $A\rightarrow B$ as the linear arrow $A{-\!\circ }B\otimes \top$ .

Whereas full linear logic (ie. propositional linear logic with multiplicatives, additives and exponentials) is undecidable, full affine logic is decidable.

Affine logic forms the foundation of ludics.

Notes

^ Jean-Yves Girard, 1997. 'Affine'. Message to the TYPES mailing list.
^ Grishin, 1974, and later, Grishin, 1981.
^ Cf. Frederic Fitch's demonstrably consistent set theory

References

V.N. Grishin, 1974. “A nonstandard logic and its application to set theory,” (Rus-

sian). Studies in Formalized Languages and Nonclassical Logics (Russian), 135-171. Izdat, “Nauka,” Moskow. .

V.N. Grishin, 1981. “Predicate and set-theoretic calculi based on logic without contraction rules,” (Russian). Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR Seriya Matematicheskaya 45(1):47-68. 239. Math. USSR Izv., 18, no.1, Moscow.
Ketonen and Weyhrauch, 1984, A decidable fragment of predicate calculus. Theoretical Computer Science 32:297-307.
Ketonen and Bellin, 1989. A decision procedure revisited: notes on Direct Logic. In Linear Logic and its Implementation.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-'''Affine logic''' is a [[substructural logic]] that denies the [[structural rule]] of [[Idempotency of entailment|contraction]]. It can also be characterized as [[linear logic]] with [[weakening]].  V. N. Grishin introduced it in 1974<ref>"A non standard logic and its application to set theory", ''Investigations in formalized language and non-classical logics''. [ Ob odnoy njestandartnoy logike i ee primenjenii k tjeorii mnozhestv, Issledovania po formalizovannym jazykam i neklasitcheskim logikam, Izdavateljstvo Nauka (1974)]</ref>, after observing that [[Russell's paradox]] cannot be derived without contraction (e.g. in the naive set-theoretic [[sequent calculus]]).
+'''Affine logic''' is a [[substructural logic]] whose proof theory rejects the [[structural rule]] of [[Idempotency of entailment|contraction]]. It can also be characterized as [[linear logic]] with [[weakening]].
+The name "affine logic" is associated with [[linear logic]], to which is differs by allowing the weakening rule.  [[Jean-Yves Girard]] introduced the name as part of the [[geometry of interaction]] semantics of linear logic, which characterises linear logic in terms of linear algebra; here he alludes to [[affine transformation]]s on vector spaces<ref>[[Jean-Yves Girard]], 1997.  '[http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~sweirich/types/archive/1997-98/msg00134.html Affine]'.  Message to the TYPES mailing list.</ref>.
+The logic predated linear logic.  V. N. Grishin used this logic in 1974<ref>Grishin, 1974, and later, Grishin, 1981.</ref>, after observing that [[Russell's paradox]] cannot be derived in a set theory without contraction, even with an unbounded [[comprehension axiom]]<ref>Cf.  [[Frederic Fitch]]'s [[demonstrably consistent set theory]]</ref>.  Likewise, the logic formed the basis of a decidable subtheory of [[predicate logic]], called 'Direct logic' (Ketonen & Wehrauch, 1984; Ketonen & Bellin, 1989).
 Affine logic can be embedded into linear logic by rewriting the affine arrow <math>A \rightarrow B</math> as the linear arrow <math>A {-\!\circ} B \otimes \top</math>.
-Whereas full linear logic (ie. linear logic with multiplicatives, additives and exponentials) is undecidable, full affine logic is decidable.
+Whereas full linear logic (ie. propositional linear logic with multiplicatives, additives and exponentials) is undecidable, full affine logic is decidable.
 Affine logic forms the foundation of [[ludics]].
+== Notes ==
+<references />
 ==References==
+* V.N. Grishin, 1974. “A nonstandard logic and its application to set theory,” (Rus-
-* Gianluigi Bellin, 1991.  '[http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~sweirich/types/archive/1991/msg00083.html affine logic]'.  Message to the TYPES mailing list.
+sian). Studies in Formalized Languages and Nonclassical Logics (Russian), 135-171. Izdat, “Nauka,” Moskow. .
-* [[Jean-Yves Girard]], 1997.  '[http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~sweirich/types/archive/1997-98/msg00134.html Affine]'.  Message to the TYPES mailing list.
+* V.N. Grishin, 1981. “Predicate and set-theoretic calculi based on logic without contraction rules,” (Russian).  Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR Seriya Matematicheskaya 45(1):47-68. 239.  Math. USSR Izv., 18, no.1, Moscow.
-<references/>
+* Ketonen and Weyhrauch, 1984, A decidable fragment of predicate calculus. Theoretical Computer Science 32:297-307.
+* Ketonen and Bellin, 1989. A decision procedure revisited: notes on Direct Logic.  In ''Linear Logic and its Implementation''.
 ==See also==
@@ Line 19: / Line 30: @@
 {{logic-stub}}
-{{unref|date=December 2007}} <!-- mailing list is not a reliable source -->