Jump to content

Talk:Hoodlum (film): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Sambot (talk | contribs)
BOT: Cleanup of {{Film}}
Xenobot Mk V (talk | contribs)
m Bot) Tagging for WP:USFILMS (Plugin++)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Film|American-task-force=yes
{{Film
|class=stub
|class=stub
|needs-plot=yes}}
|needs-plot=yes}}

Revision as of 09:25, 28 July 2009

WikiProject iconFilm: American Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

"Gang War" my foot

The Wikipedia "encyclopedia" contains some of the most absurd and weirdest comments ever made in all of history. Some idiot has written that a "gang war" involving "black" gangsters existed in New York in the 1920s. That is a crazy statement. Negroes were shoe-shine boys, janitors, chauffeurs, porters, and servants in New York City, not gangsters. Superslum 17:33, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers of people
  • 3,437,202 in 1900
  • 4,766,883 in 1910
  • 5,621,151 in 1920

In 1910, the negro population numbered 91,709, which was less than two percent of the total population of the city. In 1920 and 1930 the negro population of New York City remained at about two percent of the total population of the city.

Colored people were mopping floors in New York City in the 1920s and the 1930s. They weren't running amok engaging in a gang war with Jews and Italians. Any person who claims that the colored people of New York City were gangsters who battled Jews and Italians is speaking propaganda and lies. Superslum 13:03, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Article Broken

...I was attempting to access a description of the *film* Hoodlum, and received no disambiguation/link options from this article. Had to find the stub by a roundabout way.

Since that Superslum fellow seems to have wandered off (or got back on his meds, whatever) it may be safe to revert/restore at this point without getting in an edit war. Just sayin'.

66.222.50.71 05:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]