Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Molloy (footballer): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Keep vote
Line 46: Line 46:
*'''Keep''' Professional footballer playing in the [[League of Ireland]].[[Special:Contributions/89.168.146.91|89.168.146.91]] ([[User talk:89.168.146.91|talk]]) 18:14, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Professional footballer playing in the [[League of Ireland]].[[Special:Contributions/89.168.146.91|89.168.146.91]] ([[User talk:89.168.146.91|talk]]) 18:14, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Per above.[[User:Belacqua Shuah|Belacqua Shuah]] ([[User talk:Belacqua Shuah|talk]]) 18:16, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Per above.[[User:Belacqua Shuah|Belacqua Shuah]] ([[User talk:Belacqua Shuah|talk]]) 18:16, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', and I am feeling that the "fully professional" requirement at [[WP:ATHLETE]] does not accurately reflect consensus and should be modified. Comparing this to San Marino is pretty much a straw man. Ireland is not some silly little country on a small isle in the Atlantic. It is comparable to my country of Norway in size, and the interest in football is almost surely of the same level. Players at the top national level in a country like that get covered in the press. The idea is to ensure that the athletes we cover are playing at a high enough level where there is widespread public interest for what they are doing, not that everyone gets ''paid'' for what they are doing. Given that the exploits of clubs like Galway United, and the players who play for them are well-covered in Irish press (e.g. [http://www.rte.ie/sport/soccer/2009/0724/bray_galway.html]), and that the basics of the article are verifiable [http://soccer-stats.irishtimes.com/?pStr=Player&plid=209095&cust=&lang=0], the article should pass notability criteria. [[User:Sjakkalle|Sjakkalle]] [[User talk:Sjakkalle|<small>(Check!)</small>]] 14:13, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:13, 29 July 2009

Jason Molloy (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Footballer fails WP:ATHLETE as he has not played at fully-professional level of football. Lack of non-trivial significant third-party sources means he also fails the general notability guidelines at WP:GNG. Only independent source is a stats page which doesn't confirm he passes WP:ATH or give us any significant coverage of this person. --Jimbo[online] 15:11, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Your list of AfDs about Irish soccer player is biased as it doesn't include the many numerous players who have been deleted via PROD or AfD - a number which far outweighs those that have been kept. GiantSnowman 15:18, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • WHAT? Show me your list of players that have played in the Premier Division in Ireland that have been deleted or else stop flappin yer gums because providing a list of every player under the sun that has gone to AfD is about a relevant as quotin the price of cabbage.--Vintagekits (talk) 15:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - player fails WP:ATHLETE (as he hasn't "competed at the fully professional level of a sport") and WP:N (as he hasn't "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject"). GiantSnowman 15:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I'm opposed to this deletionism in general - as Vinatagekits says, it almost looks like disruptive editing, but this player unfortuanately does not meet the criteria here. I'd suggest the article history be kept however, to facilitate its reappearance should notable sources appear. Jhealy (talk) 15:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, can you explain the difference between this player and his team-mate Niall Walsh who you !voted to Keep especially as Molloy has played a significant amount more game for Galway and scored in the Premier Division - unlike Walsh.--Vintagekits (talk) 16:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If he is a member of the FAI Premier Division then he appears to be a member of a top level professional league to me. -Falcon8765 (talk) 18:36, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The FAI Premier Division isn't fully-professional though. Shamrock Rovers website says they're part-time. --Jimbo[online] 19:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
So what? Whats yer point? The league slips in and out of full professionalism to predominantly full professionalism. The fact remains that it is the top league in a major footballing nation - therefore notable as far as I, and the community concensus, are concerned.--Vintagekits (talk) 20:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails WP:N as the sources provided in the article only consist of stats and brief mentions in match reports (this guideline requires more than a trivial mention, even if the subject isn't the main topic of the source), fails WP:BIO as he has not acheived anything of note, and fails WP:ATHLETE as he has not played at a fully professional level (many of the teams in the Irish league are part-timers). Bettia (bring on the trumpets!) 06:30, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Vintagekits. BigDunc 16:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Player is professional, plays in a professional team and a league where eight out of ten teams are professional. Now how he can fail WP:N is beyond me. I'll put in reliable references to show he is notable.--Leagueofireland (talk) 17:10, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Per User:Leagueofireland, the article I mean, not the flames on this talk page! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sioraf (talkcontribs) 17:33, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Professional footballer playing in the League of Ireland.89.168.146.91 (talk) 18:14, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Per above.Belacqua Shuah (talk) 18:16, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, and I am feeling that the "fully professional" requirement at WP:ATHLETE does not accurately reflect consensus and should be modified. Comparing this to San Marino is pretty much a straw man. Ireland is not some silly little country on a small isle in the Atlantic. It is comparable to my country of Norway in size, and the interest in football is almost surely of the same level. Players at the top national level in a country like that get covered in the press. The idea is to ensure that the athletes we cover are playing at a high enough level where there is widespread public interest for what they are doing, not that everyone gets paid for what they are doing. Given that the exploits of clubs like Galway United, and the players who play for them are well-covered in Irish press (e.g. [1]), and that the basics of the article are verifiable [2], the article should pass notability criteria. Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:13, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]