Jump to content

Tree farm: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 16: Line 16:


A May 19, 2008 article in [[Wired magazine]] stated, "A tree absorbs roughly 1,500 pounds of [[Carbon dioxide|CO<sub>2</sub>]] in its first 55 years... CO<sub>2</sub> is converted into [[oxygen]] through [[photosynthesis]]. Suggesting that a well-managed tree farm acts like a factory for sucking CO<sub>2</sub> out of the atmosphere, so the most climate-friendly policy is to continually cut down trees and plant new ones... Plant seedlings and harvest them as soon as their powers of [[CO2 sequestration|carbon sequestration]] begin to flag, and use the wood to produce only high-quality durable goods like furniture and houses."<ref>[http://www.wired.com/science/planetearth/magazine/16-06/ff_heresies_04forests Power, Matt; "Old-Growth Forests Can Actually Contribute to Global Warming"; [[wired.com]]; [[May 19]], [[2008]]]</ref>
A May 19, 2008 article in [[Wired magazine]] stated, "A tree absorbs roughly 1,500 pounds of [[Carbon dioxide|CO<sub>2</sub>]] in its first 55 years... CO<sub>2</sub> is converted into [[oxygen]] through [[photosynthesis]]. Suggesting that a well-managed tree farm acts like a factory for sucking CO<sub>2</sub> out of the atmosphere, so the most climate-friendly policy is to continually cut down trees and plant new ones... Plant seedlings and harvest them as soon as their powers of [[CO2 sequestration|carbon sequestration]] begin to flag, and use the wood to produce only high-quality durable goods like furniture and houses."<ref>[http://www.wired.com/science/planetearth/magazine/16-06/ff_heresies_04forests Power, Matt; "Old-Growth Forests Can Actually Contribute to Global Warming"; [[wired.com]]; [[May 19]], [[2008]]]</ref>

However, the idea of cutting down existing old forests to replace them with faster growing carbon sequestering young forests is short sighted. Besides the other ecological benefits of old forests, much carbon is stored in branches, roots and soils that is released on harvest. Experts estimate that 20% of greenhouse gas emissions come from deforestation. Yet forests are the ultimate in renewable resource. A well-managed forest can produce wood, help clean the water and air, as well as provide a home for wildlife and a place for recreation now and essentially forever. In addition, rapidly growing forests remove and sequester large amounts of carbon dioxide. (Growing one pound of wood in a vigorous young forest removes 1.47 pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and replaces it with 1.07 pounds of oxygen.) In short, while good forestry practices are not the only solution to the problems of climate change and environmental degradation, there is no workable solution without them.
However, the idea of cutting down existing old forests to replace them with faster growing carbon sequestering young forests is short sighted. Besides the other ecological benefits of old forests, much carbon is stored in branches, roots and soils that is released on harvest. Experts estimate that 20% of greenhouse gas emissions come from deforestation. Yet forests are the ultimate in renewable resource. A well-managed forest can produce wood, help clean the water and air, as well as provide a home for wildlife and a place for recreation now and essentially forever. In addition, rapidly growing forests remove and sequester large amounts of carbon dioxide. (Growing one pound of wood in a vigorous young forest removes 1.47 pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and replaces it with 1.07 pounds of oxygen.) In short, while good forestry practices are not the only solution to the problems of climate change and environmental degradation, there is no workable solution without them.
Forests sequester carbon in the branches, roots, soils [http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/R40186_20090203.pdf] and understory of living forests, as well as long-lived wood products (the wood that in your house will be around a long time.) Offsets will buy us some time and they are worth doing for that reason alone, but there are lots of other reasons to preserve natural lands and maintain the ecological services http://www.fs.fed.us/ecosystemservices they provide.
Forests sequester carbon in the branches, roots, soils [http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/R40186_20090203.pdf] and understory of living forests, as well as long-lived wood products (the wood that in your house will be around a long time.) Offsets will buy us some time and they are worth doing for that reason alone, but there are lots of other reasons to preserve natural lands and maintain the ecological services [http://www.fs.fed.us/ecosystemservices] they provide.
CO2 & Forest Health
CO2 & Forest Health

Revision as of 18:08, 31 July 2009

Template:Globalize/USA A tree farm is a privately owned forest managed for timber production. The term tree farm is also used to refer to plantations and to tree nurseries.

American tree farm system

The American Tree Farm System (ATFS) is the oldest third party forest certification in the world. The ATFS [1] was established in 1941 in response to the need to protect forest resources on private lands, provide advice and assistance to forest owners and ensure the continued supply of wood and other forest products. ATFS has certified 24 million acres of privately owned forestland and over 90,000 family forest owners in 46 states.

ATFS has been successful in helping forest owners protect water resources, enhance wildlife habitat and create recreational opportunities all while harvesting wood in sustainable ways. Some ATFS certified forests are now in their third or fourth generation. [2] of sustainable harvests on the same land.

The Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) endorsed ATFS in August of 2008 [3] after an extensive assessment, meaning that ATFS wood meets an accepted international standard for “certified wood,” [4] which may help sales in world markets. Only around 10% of the wood sold globally is from certified forests, but this is growing rapidly. PEFC is by far the largest certification network, currently comprising thirty-five independent national forest certification programs with 510 million certified acres in the various programs. Among the countries with PEFC certified forests are such places as Canada, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Spain Brazil and Malaysia.

Effect on global warming

Carbon is as necessary to life as oxygen. Growing plants covert carbon dioxide to biomass and release it when they decompose or respire and this cycle has been going on for billions of years. The processes have been roughly in balance. They have to be; otherwise all the carbon would have been used up billions of years ago and life on earth would have perished. This explains why mature ecosystems absorb little carbon dioxide. An established old growth forest doesn’t remove much carbon from the atmosphere, while a rapidly growing new forest soaks up a lot of carbon, and that is what we exactly what tree farming works to accomplish. The USDA has a good online calculator [5] for how much carbon is sequestered in various types of forests.

A May 19, 2008 article in Wired magazine stated, "A tree absorbs roughly 1,500 pounds of CO2 in its first 55 years... CO2 is converted into oxygen through photosynthesis. Suggesting that a well-managed tree farm acts like a factory for sucking CO2 out of the atmosphere, so the most climate-friendly policy is to continually cut down trees and plant new ones... Plant seedlings and harvest them as soon as their powers of carbon sequestration begin to flag, and use the wood to produce only high-quality durable goods like furniture and houses."[1]

However, the idea of cutting down existing old forests to replace them with faster growing carbon sequestering young forests is short sighted. Besides the other ecological benefits of old forests, much carbon is stored in branches, roots and soils that is released on harvest. Experts estimate that 20% of greenhouse gas emissions come from deforestation. Yet forests are the ultimate in renewable resource. A well-managed forest can produce wood, help clean the water and air, as well as provide a home for wildlife and a place for recreation now and essentially forever. In addition, rapidly growing forests remove and sequester large amounts of carbon dioxide. (Growing one pound of wood in a vigorous young forest removes 1.47 pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and replaces it with 1.07 pounds of oxygen.) In short, while good forestry practices are not the only solution to the problems of climate change and environmental degradation, there is no workable solution without them.

Forests sequester carbon in the branches, roots, soils [6] and understory of living forests, as well as long-lived wood products (the wood that in your house will be around a long time.) Offsets will buy us some time and they are worth doing for that reason alone, but there are lots of other reasons to preserve natural lands and maintain the ecological services [7] they provide.

CO2 & Forest Health

Carbon dioxide makes plants grow faster and stronger, so presumably higher levels of CO2 in the air as a result of burning fossil fuels would make forests grow faster. Duke University did a study where they dosed a loblolly pine plantation with elevated levels of CO2. [8] The studies showed that the pines did indeed grow faster and stronger. They were also less prone to damage during ice storms, which is a factor that limits loblolly growth farther north. The forest did relatively better during dry years. The hypothesis is that the limiting factors in the growth of the pines are nutrients such as nitrogen, which is in deficit on much of the pine land in the Southeast. In dry years, however, the trees don’t bump up against those factors since they are growing more slowly because water is the limiting factor. When rain is plentiful they are reach the limits of the site's nutrients and the extra CO2 isn’t much of a benefit. Most forest soils in Southeastern region are deficient in N and P as well as trace minerals. Pine forests often sit on land that was used for cotton, corn or tobacco. These crops depleted the soils, which were never very deep or fertile to begin with. Building and rebuilding the soils is one of tasks of tree farmers.

One solution is just fertilizing better. This is something we might want to do anyway. I think this is a place for biosolids [9]. Biosolids are treated sewage from municipal or agricultural sources. In Virginia and NC, we have a lot of chicken and hog operations. They produce too much manure; our soils could use it and the trees would grow better and faster. Why this is not being done more widely is anybody’s guess. I suspect it is misguided regulation coupled with plain inertia.

See also

References