Jump to content

Talk:Satguru: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Jossi (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jossi (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
;Recent edits
;Recent edits
#removed Sikhism template as this article refers to Hiduism, Sikhism and Surat Shabd
#removed Sikhism template as this article refers to Hiduism, Sikhism and Surat Shabd
#removed material that is discussed in the [[Guru]], [[Contemporary SantMat movement]] and others
#removed material that is discussed in the [[Guru]], [[Contemporary Sant Mat movement]] and others
[[User:Jossifresco|&asymp; jossi fresco &asymp;]] <small>[[User_talk:Jossifresco|t]] &bull; [[Special:Emailuser/Jossifresco|@]]</small> 00:17, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
[[User:Jossifresco|&asymp; jossi fresco &asymp;]] <small>[[User_talk:Jossifresco|t]] &bull; [[Special:Emailuser/Jossifresco|@]]</small> 00:17, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:17, 8 December 2005

Propose to merge this into Guru. ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t@ 17:27, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Satguru" and "Guru" really don't have the same meaning in those traditions that make a distinction, e.g., Sikhism & Surat Shabd Yoga, even if some other traditions use them interchangably, e.g., Hinduism. How would you preserve this distinction by merging the two articles? I don't support a merge at this time. RDF talk 17:59, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

By creating a new section on the Guru article, named Satguru and explaining the specifics of this term. What do you think? ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t@ 18:07, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Well you could merge the Hindu sections about Satguru with Guru, but the Sikh version is not the same. Satguru is a name for god, like Waheguru and is not a learned teacher. Sukh | ਸੁਖ | Talk 18:28, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If the redirect goes directly to the section, like shown below, I can live with it. RDF talk 18:31, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  1. REDIRECT Guru#Satguru
I don't think that Redirects can include anchors... So we can leave it like this for now. ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t@ 23:27, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I guess you're right, but it was worth a try. I also think the "See also" works for now. RDF talk 23:38, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure that Sikhs refer to their gurus as satgurus. Can you confirm this? ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t@ 23:30, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they do, not all, they use various names. Jossi.The darkness/light thing bothers me as what you do is making it too easy. I am not a scholar, but did some research for you, maybe that helps. Since , gu is never darkness in Sanskrit, Guna is "darkness" on the level of consciousness (greed, anger, passion) and ru has amongst other meanings "cutting" , "breaks" , "kill". Since this is not a proof it does make more sense(especially in the translation of the upnanshad). the breaker of guna. The etymology of ru as light must IMO derived from somewhere else, i don't know. Since the basic word gru or guru is meaning the heavy/important man, the other meaning was probaly added out of religious poetry or to give it a deeper meaning constructing such etymologies and is close to, whoever thougt that, what Prabhupada once gave as etymology to Guru. Thomas h 14:01, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]


That may be the case, but in folllowing Wikipedia policy, we can only write based on sources we find. Check my last edit to Guru. Thanks. ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t@ 21:12, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits
  1. removed Sikhism template as this article refers to Hiduism, Sikhism and Surat Shabd
  2. removed material that is discussed in the Guru, Contemporary Sant Mat movement and others

≈ jossi fresco ≈ t@ 00:17, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]