Template talk:SEPTA: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Girard St.? |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Should the [[Girard_Street_line]] be on this template? --[[User:Jfruh|Jfruh]] 06:29, 8 December 2005 (UTC) |
Should the [[Girard_Street_line]] be on this template? --[[User:Jfruh|Jfruh]] 06:29, 8 December 2005 (UTC) |
||
:Probley, have to figure out how i am going to work it in. --[[User:Boothy443|Boothy443]] | [[User talk:Boothy443| trácht ar]] 07:24, 8 December 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:24, 8 December 2005
Hey, I love this template and thanks for adding it! But surely the subway-surface lines belong on here as well? I'd add them, but I'm not sure what "division" they're in. --Jfruh 13:05, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
- I knew i forgot something. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 18:06, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
SEPTA R4
This template deals with the SEPTA Regional Rail lines in their present form. The R4 line was proposed as a local service from Bryn Mawr but never implemented. That's why the R4 should not be in the template. Pilatus 13:46, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
- Actually the history is much more complicated - SEPTA Regional Rail describes it in detail. There's no reason to restrict the template to the present form. --SPUI (talk) 07:55, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
- We don't have defunct lines (such as the trackless trolleys) in the template, so there is no reason to have lines that never existed in the template. Pilatus 00:42, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
- If someone writes an article on the trackless trolley routes, they shoudl be added to the template. --SPUI (talk) 06:09, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
- If someone gets around to write about the R4 the link can go back in. Pilatus 23:58, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
Girard St.?
Should the Girard_Street_line be on this template? --Jfruh 06:29, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
- Probley, have to figure out how i am going to work it in. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 07:24, 8 December 2005 (UTC)