Talk:Dixmont, Maine: Difference between revisions
→removed entry about jayme langford: new section |
Buskahegian (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Wikipedia is not a place for commercial adverts. Therefore I have removed it. |
Wikipedia is not a place for commercial adverts. Therefore I have removed it. |
||
[[Special:Contributions/174.49.116.149|174.49.116.149]] ([[User talk:174.49.116.149|talk]]) 01:11, 5 August 2009 (UTC) |
[[Special:Contributions/174.49.116.149|174.49.116.149]] ([[User talk:174.49.116.149|talk]]) 01:11, 5 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
== hey, not so fast 174.49.116.149 == |
|||
The Jayme Langford wiki article is only a candidate for deletion because you've posted a request to delete it. The matter's under debate. Second, there's no clear proof that her wiki page is self-created. According to the site's history, it was created by Epbr123, and she intervened only a month later. Third, she's notable: making the cover of Hustler and/or appearing in Penthouse is major validation in the world of nude models, and obviously her name is all over the web. Fourth, you can be born in Rhode Island, currenly live in Californis, but reside in Dixmont, Maine in between. The Hustler web-site lists Dixmont as her home-town. And finally, a town the size of Dixmont, Maine can only be proud that such a beautiful and relatively famous young woman calls it her hometown. To complete erase her wiki presence, which it seems is the agenda here, would be prudish, and hardly popular, especially in Dixmont. The town's history doesn't end with Abner Weed. I agree with you, however, that the entry should not advertise commercial web-sites. So as a compromise I've re-edited the paragraph to preserve her notable presence, but without the said references. [[User:Buskahegian|Buskahegian]] ([[User talk:Buskahegian|talk]]) 16:21, 5 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:21, 5 August 2009
Cities Unassessed | |||||||
|
Maine Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
removed entry about jayme langford
I've removed the following lines from notable residents: "Jayme Langford is an erotic model in California who is gaining much acclaim for her work. She has been featured in many major adult magazines." Here's why: 1. she's not notable. her self-made wikipedia entry is a candidate for deletion because of non-notability 2. she has been using wikipedia to advertise her own paid, commercial website and 3. her own page lists her as being from Providence, RI, and her entry in this page lists her from Cali. Which one is it?
Wikipedia is not a place for commercial adverts. Therefore I have removed it. 174.49.116.149 (talk) 01:11, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
hey, not so fast 174.49.116.149
The Jayme Langford wiki article is only a candidate for deletion because you've posted a request to delete it. The matter's under debate. Second, there's no clear proof that her wiki page is self-created. According to the site's history, it was created by Epbr123, and she intervened only a month later. Third, she's notable: making the cover of Hustler and/or appearing in Penthouse is major validation in the world of nude models, and obviously her name is all over the web. Fourth, you can be born in Rhode Island, currenly live in Californis, but reside in Dixmont, Maine in between. The Hustler web-site lists Dixmont as her home-town. And finally, a town the size of Dixmont, Maine can only be proud that such a beautiful and relatively famous young woman calls it her hometown. To complete erase her wiki presence, which it seems is the agenda here, would be prudish, and hardly popular, especially in Dixmont. The town's history doesn't end with Abner Weed. I agree with you, however, that the entry should not advertise commercial web-sites. So as a compromise I've re-edited the paragraph to preserve her notable presence, but without the said references. Buskahegian (talk) 16:21, 5 August 2009 (UTC)