Talk:Unfaithful (2002 film): Difference between revisions
m Tagging(Plugin++) Added {{ChicagoWikiProject}}. |
Xenobot Mk V (talk | contribs) m Bot) Tagging for WP:BRITFILM |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ChicagoWikiProject|class=|importance=}} |
{{ChicagoWikiProject|class=|importance=}} |
||
{{FailedGA|02:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)}} |
{{FailedGA|02:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)}} |
||
{{Film |
{{Film|British-task-force=yes |
||
|small= |
|small= |
||
|nested= |
|nested= |
||
Revision as of 01:14, 6 August 2009
 | Chicago Unassessed | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | Unfaithful (2002 film) was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 27, 2008). There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | Film: British / American B‑class | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:Unfaithful.JPG
Image:Unfaithful.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
#c-BetacommandBot-2008-02-12T02:33:00.000Z-Fair_use_rationale_for_Image:Unfaithful.JPG){kind=link}
GA review
I'll be doing the GA review for this article. Here are some questions I had while reading the article:
- The part about the actors gaining weight left me wondering if they did. Did Lane? Did Gere?
- Biziou often used two cameras for the film's intimate scenes in order to spare the actors any discomfort. - how would this decrease discomfort?
- What were the other endings? What got re-shot? What did the test audiences not like about the ending that made them go back to the original?
- What happened with Fatal Attraction that would make the director shoot five endings?
- How did the video do on DVD? In rentals?
I'll do a copy edit of the article once all of these questions are answered. The article will remain on hold for one week. Good luck! Nikki311 01:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Because there has been no improvements made to the article, I am failing it. Nikki311 02:57, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Huh?
"The filming proved to be challenging for the actors who had to endure smoke being piped in during scenes for 18 to 20 hours a day."
I don't understand this sentence. Where and why was smoke being piped in? What scenes? 18 to twenty hours a day? The actors are working for that long each day? What?? TripOnMyShip (talk) 19:56, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
No mention of the soundtrack. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.76.64.65 (talk) 20:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC)