Talk:Surviving the Game: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:33, 7 August 2009

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Encyclopedic snuff

This article is not up to encyclopedic snuff, however the irreverent and cynical fashion in which it is written provided me with laughs. I'll leave it be in spite Jimbo Wales' wishes. 67.188.131.107 04:53, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Dumaka (talk) 17:25, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not funny at all, nor is it proper wikipedia procedure to undo edits because you personally made and prefer them. While I cannot edit this without creating an account, and lack the inclination to do so, I can ask that Dumaka quits his/her juvenile actions and makes the proper revert. 96.50.99.29 (talk) 00:22, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but you don't run wikipedia. This article has been this way for years so don't touch it. No one has had a problem with it for 12 months so don't call my edits juvenile or vandalism. And please stop calling me names as well. Dumaka (talk) 02:45, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Others are allowed to edit the article if they feel they can improve it. You do not own this article. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 18:51, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's up to Wikipedia snuff now. I hope everyone is happy. Dumaka (talk) 01:02, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SurvivingTheGame.jpg

Image:SurvivingTheGame.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

This is a work of ART!!!!!!!! Dumaka, you kick ass. You should be a comedian.--Ilivetocomment (talk) 01:27, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do what I can. Dumaka (talk) 00:33, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it WAS a work of art until 96.50.99.29 (talk) started complaining about it. Dumaka (talk) 01:19, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Monologue removal, other things this article needs

I've removed the large section containing the blockquote as it's really rather unnecessary to the article. The plot section already summarizes the content of the monologue very well, and having a large section of the dialogue in the article like this is a violation of WP:NOT#PLOT. Wikipedia shouldn't be covering the plot of the story in so much detail that someone else could write the script themselves. Also, in posting large bits of the dialogue like that, we risk some legal issues since the movie is copyrighted.

To go back to the NOT#PLOT point, much of the "Story details" section needs to be cut down and merged with the rest of the plot section. This section is far too long and is not written in an encyclopedic tone. I'll work on it some myself now as I already did for the plot section, but I'll need some help as I haven't seen the film personally.

We also could use some more information on the production of this film, the "backstage" kind of info. Like I said earlier, we shouldn't be covering just the plot, but other information about the film as well. The line in the plot section mentioning that the monologue was ad libbed could be moved to a "production" section, for example. Along those lines, this article needs some references to back up the information as well. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 19:08, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The plot has been shortened and cleaned up to what appear to be the most major points; it still needs to be shortened further by someone more familiar with the film. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:36, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok fine. I'll fix it. Dumaka (talk) 00:36, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 :I do what I can. [[User:Dumaka|Dumaka]] ([[User talk:Dumaka|talk]]) 00:33, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
-::Well, it WAS a work of art. [[User:Dumaka|Dumaka]] ([[User talk:Dumaka|talk]]) 01:19, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
+::Well, it WAS a work of art until [[Special:Contributions/96.50.99.29|96.50.99.29]] ([[User talk:96.50.99.29|talk]]) started complaining about it. [[User:Dumaka|Dumaka]] ([[User talk:Dumaka|talk]]) 01:19, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 == Monologue removal, other things this article needs ==