Jump to content

Talk:Tarrasque (Dungeons & Dragons): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 85.243.172.219 - "Incorrect Tone: "
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{D&D|class=start|importance=low}}
{{D&D|class=start|importance=low}}

==Incorrect Trivia==
I removed the reference to the Fallout "Deathclaw" in the "Trivia" section, as it is incorrect; please see http://nma-fallout.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=452924#452924, an interview with a creator of Fallout and the monster in question.


==Incomplete references==
==Incomplete references==

Revision as of 08:40, 8 August 2009

WikiProject iconDungeons & Dragons Redirect‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
D&D to-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Incorrect Trivia

I removed the reference to the Fallout "Deathclaw" in the "Trivia" section, as it is incorrect; please see http://nma-fallout.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=452924#452924, an interview with a creator of Fallout and the monster in question.

Incomplete references

Place unformatted & incomplete references here.--Robbstrd 01:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • "The Tarrasque Creature Incarnations By Robert Wiese [1]

Incorrect Tone

Wikipedia is not a Dungeons & Dragons instruction manual, nor should it be an alternative resource in lieu of the former. See What Wikipedia is not. I am editing in accordance with these standards. --Pathogen 02:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And furthermore, the language is completely improper for an encyclopedic article. Straight facts, not prose, please. --Pathogen 02:12, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well since this is about an imaginary beast the facts can be hard to decipher, can't they? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.243.172.219 (talk) 07:00, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]