Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brianna Blaze: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Delete |
KevinOKeeffe (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''Delete''' - Having had a quick look around I support the nom's argument that this does not pass [[WP:PORNBIO]]. Other than the base stats the article seems to comprise mostly of [[WP:OR]] -- <font face="Verdana"><font color="Blue">[[User:Cabe6403|Cabe]]</font><font color="Green">[[User:Cabe6403/Gallery|6403]]</font> <sup>([[user_talk:Cabe6403|Talk]]•[[User:Cabe6403/Guest book|Sign]])</sup></font> 13:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - Having had a quick look around I support the nom's argument that this does not pass [[WP:PORNBIO]]. Other than the base stats the article seems to comprise mostly of [[WP:OR]] -- <font face="Verdana"><font color="Blue">[[User:Cabe6403|Cabe]]</font><font color="Green">[[User:Cabe6403/Gallery|6403]]</font> <sup>([[user_talk:Cabe6403|Talk]]•[[User:Cabe6403/Guest book|Sign]])</sup></font> 13:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' Clearly doesn't pass [[WP:Pornbio]], and its difficult to imagine how this could otherwise achieve Notability. Of the three cites, two are to bulletin board posts. Merely having a listing at the [[IAFD]] does not confer Notability. And that's all she's got; no awards, no nominations for awards. [[User:KevinOKeeffe|KevinOKeeffe]] ([[User talk:KevinOKeeffe|talk]]) 14:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:31, 10 August 2009
- Brianna Blaze (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable sources, and doesn't pass the criteria at WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 12:00, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | Talk 12:35, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - Having had a quick look around I support the nom's argument that this does not pass WP:PORNBIO. Other than the base stats the article seems to comprise mostly of WP:OR -- Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 13:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly doesn't pass WP:Pornbio, and its difficult to imagine how this could otherwise achieve Notability. Of the three cites, two are to bulletin board posts. Merely having a listing at the IAFD does not confer Notability. And that's all she's got; no awards, no nominations for awards. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 14:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC)