Talk:2012 Republican Party presidential primaries: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:01, 11 August 2009

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2012 Republican Party presidential primaries article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

United States: Presidential elections Unassessed Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections.

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 February 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Future

I believe that we don't need to get rid of the potential candidates after someone announces their candidacy. We can keep them all the way through the the primary election season. Here is a good example: Democratic Party (United States) presidential candidates, 2008. Does anyone disagree?--Jerzeykydd (talk) 18:11, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We should, however, add the official ones to the 2012 page. Diamond Dave 19:00, 10 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by David1982m (talk • contribs)

Agree with all of the above.--JayJasper (talk) 19:11, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shorten the Potential Candidates List

It seems really unnecessary to have a mini paragraph after each source that is cited in favor of a potential candidate. Why don't we simply put two or three references after the name of each potential candidate, and do away with that last column altogether? It would make the page much cleaner and neater. If people want to know what each source says about each candidate, they can click the link and read it themselves. Thoughts? --Ai.kefu (talk) 21:01, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 :::Agree with all of the above.--[[User:JayJasper|JayJasper]] ([[User talk:JayJasper|talk]]) 19:11, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
+== Shorten the Potential Candidates List ==
+It seems really unnecessary to have a mini paragraph after each source that is cited in favor of a potential candidate.  Why don't we simply put two or three references after the name of each potential candidate, and do away with that last column altogether?  It would make the page much cleaner and neater.  If people want to know what each source says about each candidate, they can click the link and read it themselves.  Thoughts?  --[[User:Ai.kefu|Ai.kefu]] ([[User talk:Ai.kefu|talk]]) 21:01, 11 August 2009 (UTC)