Talk:Ducks Unlimited: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:27, 10 December 2005

POV Tag

I removed the POV tag as it seems pretty non-biased and factual to me. There were also no reasons given as to why it neutrality of the article was suspect. Movementarian 08:42, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I put the POV tag up because while, on the one hand, Ducks Unlimited does preserve wetlands, they've also faced criticism for being a pro-hunting group; this isn't reflected in the article as it ought to be. Furthermore, "DUC Facts" seem to be a straight copy-and-paste from somewhere (I'm still looking for where), and it reads very pro-DU-biased to me. It's not as bad a POV case as, say, Fascism (United Stated), but it needs work. - Stlemur 17:27, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == POV Tag ==
 I removed the POV tag as it seems pretty non-biased and factual to me.  There were also no reasons given as to why it neutrality of the article was suspect. [[User:Movementarian|Movementarian]] 08:42, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
+:I put the POV tag up because while, on the one hand, Ducks Unlimited does preserve wetlands, they've also faced criticism for being a pro-hunting group; this isn't reflected in the article as it ought to be. Furthermore, "DUC Facts" seem to be a straight copy-and-paste from somewhere (I'm still looking for where), and it reads very pro-DU-biased to me. It's not as bad a POV case as, say, [[Fascism (United Stated)]], but it needs work. - [[User:Stlemur|Stlemur]] 17:27, 10 December 2005 (UTC)