Jump to content

User talk:Hemant 17: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Hemant 17 (talk | contribs)
791 edits
Hemant 17 (talk | contribs)
791 edits
Line 295: Line 295:


==File:BEE India.jpg==
==File:BEE India.jpg==
Kindly help me resolve the copy right prolem. I have uploaded a low resolution image to overcome this problem
Kindly help me resolve the copy right prolem. I have uploaded a low resolution image to overcome this problem - [[User:Hemant 17|Hemant 17]] ([[User talk:Hemant 17#top|talk]]) 11:24, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:24, 19 August 2009

Hello. Concerning your contribution, National Action Plan for Climate Change, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.energymanagertraining.com/NAPCC/main.htm. As a copyright violation, National Action Plan for Climate Change appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. National Action Plan for Climate Change has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. — CactusWriter | needles 17:54, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Energy Manager Training

A tag has been placed on Energy Manager Training, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Energy Manager Training and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.Template:Do not delete — CactusWriter | needles 05:38, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Page

Orphaned non-free image (File:S L main2009.jpg)

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:S L main2009.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. B (talk) 05:39, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:BLY India.jpg)

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BLY India.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. B (talk) 05:40, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:BLY lamps.jpg)

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BLY lamps.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. B (talk) 05:40, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bureau of Energy Efficiency

A tag has been placed on Bureau of Energy Efficiency requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb1 (talk) 04:42, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bureau of Energy Efficiency

A tag has been placed on Bureau of Energy Efficiency requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 04:46, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Bureau of Energy Efficiency, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ttonyb1 (talk) 04:47, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask you a Question? Will you delete content on my personal page (copy right, spam - tags)

Hemant Vohra 04:53, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Unless it is considered to be contrary to Wikipedia guidelines, it probably would not be deleted. CSD tags are not for user pages, only mainspace articles. ttonyb1 (talk) 04:56, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sir can you check my page for these problems User:Hemant 17
Hemant Vohra 04:59, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As long as there are no attacks on others, uncivil comments or copyright violations, you should be alright. My best to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 05:07, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - my articles fail on your G11 - CSD tags criterion Hemant Vohra 05:15, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hemant 17/BLY

A tag has been placed on Hemant 17/BLY requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jamesofur (talk) 08:28, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]



---

Here I quote the discussion with the previous administrator

August 2009 == Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Bureau of Energy Efficiency, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ttonyb1 (talk) 04:47, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask you a Question? Will you delete content on my personal page (copy right, spam - tags)

Hemant Vohra 04:53, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Unless it is considered to be contrary to Wikipedia guidelines, it probably would not be deleted. CSD tags are not for user pages, only mainspace articles. ttonyb1 (talk) 04:56, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sir can you check my page for these problems User:Hemant 17
Hemant Vohra 04:59, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As long as there are no attacks on others, uncivil comments or copyright violations, you should be alright. My best to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 05:07, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - my articles fail on your G11 - CSD tags criterion Hemant Vohra 05:15, 6 August 2009 (UTC)


Yes I have relised my mistake, How can I delete the pages ````

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:05, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks --Hemant Vohra 09:06, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Bureau of Energy Efficiency, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. PLEASE DO NOT REDIRECT IT TO MY USERPAGE> I WILL ADD MORE INFO. PLEASE DO NOT COPY INFO FROM THE WEBSITE.. -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:38, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Hemant Vohra 09:41, 6 August 2009 (UTC)


PLEASE DO NOT ADD USERPAGES TO CATEGORIES. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:11, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the said Hemant Vohra 10:17, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Actually... I did that... :p --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 16:03, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Hemant Vohra 04:51, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Indo German Energy Programe - IGEN

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Indo German Energy Programe - IGEN, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.energymanagertraining.com/Presentations2008/IGENPhase2-27Aug2008/1-Activities%20of%20IGEN.pdf http://www.energymanagertraining.com/new_aboutus.php, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Indo German Energy Programe - IGEN saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:53, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hemant 17/GTZ was deleted as a copy of that same copyright infringing article. Your userpage User:Hemant 17/BLY has been deleted as a copyright violation of [1]. User:Hemant 17/BEE has been blanked and listed at the copyright problems board. Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text without verification of permission in any space. As the bottom of every edit screen indicates, "Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted." Please review the copyright policy and be sure that all text you place here is in your own words, unless you can verify that it is free for use through one of the acceptable procedures. You may use brief quotations of copyrighted text in accordance with our non-free content policy and guideline. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:58, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As these are my personal pages as already discussed - Kindly dont delete them Hemant Vohra 10:59, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but you don't have the right to store copyrighted material in your personal pages. Wikipedia does not allow copyrighted content to be placed anywhere on the project except in the fashion I explained above. I am continuing to evaluate your personal pages and if I find further copyright infringement will process it according to policy. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:16, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

kindly refer to the morning discussion

Can I ask you a Question? Will you delete content on my personal page (copy right, spam - tags)

Hemant Vohra 04:53, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Unless it is considered to be contrary to Wikipedia guidelines, it probably would not be deleted. CSD tags are not for user pages, only mainspace articles. ttonyb1 (talk) 04:56, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sir can you check my page for these problems User:Hemant 17
Hemant Vohra 04:59, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As long as there are no attacks on others, uncivil comments or copyright violations, you should be alright. My best to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 05:07, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - my articles fail on your G11 - CSD tags criterion Hemant Vohra 05:15, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Hemant Vohra 11:18, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

The page User:Hemant 17 displays none of that. The subpages I have tagged or deleted, on the other hand, do. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:19, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Also a problem, User:Hemant 17/NMEE copied from [2]. If you need copies of other sites for your personal notes, say for creating articles, you will have to store them elsewhere than on Wikipedia. By the time you place text here, it must not constitute a copyright infringement against another source. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:24, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The article National Mission for Enhanced Efficiency has been blanked and listed at the copyright problems board for handling after a week. The procedure for addressing this is at the top of this section. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:33, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
User:Hemant 17/NAPCC was a copy of [3]. It's unfortunate that the government of India does not release its material into public domain, but they don't. (See this NIC overview, [4]). It would be much simpler if we could simply replicate text from them that otherwise meets policies and guidelines, as we can with US government works, but like the UK India's government has chosen to place restrictions on reuse of government material that are not compatible with our licensing requirements. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:38, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the article on copyright. I realty appriciate your helping nature Hemant Vohra 11:45, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

User:Hemant 17/EMT has some text copied from other sites, but some of it seems not to be. I've blanked it, since we can't reproduce that material but you may be able to develop it further so that it does not infringe copyright. I'm almost finished with reviewing these subpages, and once I've completed that will stop to suggest some ways forward here. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:51, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some ideas

Okay. First, I'm sorry that your early experiences have been frustrating on Wikipedia. Evidently, in addition to copyright concerns, there have been some issues with promotional text. I myself have not been looking for promotional material in your text and so don't know precisely where you may have run into problems there. Looking at your contributions, it would seem that you are a specialist in this field, perhaps affiliated with this particular organization. If so, you should read over the conflict of interest guidelines and our business FAQ to get some ideas how to contribute without encountering these issues.

If you are an industry professional and associated with one or more of the entities about which you've been writing, you do have the option to verify permission for this text. As mentioned above, the process for that is at donating copyrighted materials. Before verifying permission, though, you should realize that your permission, which is non-revocable, will allow Wikipedia's users to change and reproduce your content, even commercially. They have to provide attribution (give you credit), but so long as they do that and comply with other licensing requirements (such as not trying to restrict reuse of it by others), you would have no say over how the material is handled. If you are comfortable with that and in position to release, the simplest way is to put a notice at the website. You can verify through e-mail. Both those processes are explained at donating copyrighted materials, but if you have questions about them I am happy to explain.

You do need to realize, though, that even if you verify permission, that doesn't mean the material will be deemed appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If, for example, it is promotional or otherwise does not meet our policies and guidelines (an overview of core issues can be read at "five pillars"), it may be deleted or changed.

If you do not verify permission, you can still contribute content about these entities if it is written in new language that does not infringe the copyright of the creator. You are more likely to meet success if you contribute one well-developed article than multiple articles about related points. Your best odds of success are if you use reliable sources (such as newspaper articles or magazine profiles) to verify how the information is notable. In addition to verifiability, other core content policies are neutrality and "no original research", which means that even if you know something is true you can only include it if you can verify it. If you stay within those core content policies and if you provide sources to verify notability, you'll probably be fine.

Please let me know if any of this is unclear. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:03, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Hemant Vohra 12:07, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I hope that things are going more smoothly for you now. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:29, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks , Wikipedia is not my zone. Hemant Vohra 10:34, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry to hear that. :/ There is kind of a steep learning curve, I'm afraid. The easiest way to learn your way around, I think (the way I did it), is probably to start with reading existing articles and fixing problems in them. I had been here for some time before I created my first article. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:47, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Best of Luck, keep the good work Hemant Vohra 11:01, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Energy use and conservation in the India

A tag has been placed on Energy use and conservation in the India, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. LK (talk) 13:22, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE:

You are NOT authorised to blank other users pages or talk pages as per Wikipedia's policies. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:49, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have full right to edit my contributions Hemant Vohra 09:38, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

YES< bUT STUFF ON MY TLK PAGE CANNOT BE REVERTED< NEITHER CN STUFF ON MY USER PAGE. Read this: WP:Talk --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 16:16, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing... When you edit a page, read the bottom... it says clearly... 'If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed for profit by others, do not submit it." ... --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 16:40, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its better do deserve honours and not get it rather than getting honours and not deserving it.. BEE HAPPY - Hemant Vohra 03:26, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Whatever.... But once, you've done it, you've done it. NOW STOP REVERTING MY EDITS. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:35, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And what makes me NOT deserving of this so called honour? 90% of my edits are in good faith and 90% of yours are vandalism... --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 16:46, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:StarLabel-OfficeBuildingsIndia.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:StarLabel-OfficeBuildingsIndia.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 03:44, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:BEE India.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:BEE India.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 00:34, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:GTZ s.gif

A tag has been placed on File:GTZ s.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 00:34, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:BEE India.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:BEE India.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:53, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Rsrikanth05 may be offensive or unwelcome. In general it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 08:02, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I edited my own comments to him Hemant Vohra 09:29, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Article categorization & stub sorting

I had gone through and standardized the categorization on a number of Indian government-related articles. I noticed tonight that for several of the articles, you reverted one of my changes: that of {{India-stub}} to {{India-gov-stub}}. The articles you changed:

So far as I can tell, all of these are, in fact, government-related articles. If you have reliable sources stating that any of these are not government-related, please correct the article where it says that they are government-related (including the source), and revert back to the general stub. However, if these are (as the articles currently all state) government-related, then the categorization should be {{India-gov-stub}}—and I've consequently changed them back. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 08:19, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So far as you can tell I work for the company in question. These are not under GOVERMENT OF INDIA but under IGEN - INDO GERMAN ENERGY PROGRAME. Thanks for your Input. Hemant Vohra 09:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Hemant Vohra. As you already know, Bachat Lamp Yojna, Bureau of Energy Efficiency and Energy Conservation Building Code, etc. are government of India programs -- and therefore are tagged as such. I think one of the difficulties you have encountered in creating these new articles is you have used what appears to be a private company website as reference. Unfortunately, that falls under the category of advertising and usually causes an article to be deleted. Or, at least, severely edited. This is even more so when an employee of a company adds links on behalf of the company. Please see WP:PROMO for more details on avoiding this. These articles about India government programs are notable and make great additions to WP. Because you are familiar with them, it would be great if you can help expand and improve them. However, they should only be referenced to official government sources, like the BEE, or independent sources, like newspapers or magazines. (For example, the current stub of Bachat Lamp Yojna). If you have questions, please feel free to ask. — CactusWriter | needles 10:39, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

your are refering to outdated Concept Note on “Bachat Lamp Yojana” and Status which was modified as per Addendum (15 December 2008) and updated version is at http://www.energymanagertraining.com/CDM/BhachatLampYojna.pdf

you can read the Revised PoA ; Revised SSC-CPA - Updated on 20 July 2009 Hemant Vohra 10:46, 17 August 2009 (UTC)


for more

CFL Lighting Scheme - Bachat Lamp Yojna (BLY)

The Bachat Lamp Yojna aims at the large scale replacement of incandescent bulbs in households by CFLs. It seeks to provide CFLs to households at the price similar to that of incandescent bulbs and plans to utilize the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) of the Kyoto Protocol to recover the cost differential between the market price of the CFLs and the price at which they are sold to households.
Bachat Lamp Yojana The Bachat Lamp Yojna is designed as a public-private partnership between the Government of India, private sector CFL suppliers and State level Electricity Distribution Companies (DISCOMs). The CFL suppliers would sell high quality CFLs to households at a price of Rs. 15 per CFL within a designated project area in a DISCOM region of operation. The CFL supplier will be chosen by the DISCOM through a due diligence process from a list of CFL suppliers empanelled by BEE. Under the scheme only 60 Watt and 100 Watt incandescent Lamps will be replaced with 11- 15 Watt and 20 - 25 Watt CFLs respectively. BEE will monitor the electricity savings in each project area in accordance with the monitoring methodology prescribed by the Executive Board of the CDM.

For this purpose, BEE has developed smart meters based on GSM technology that are fitted between the socket and the CFL in sample households in each project area. The GSM based meter collects the data on hours of use and energy consumed by the sample CFL and sends this information by SMS to the central server. An independent agency has already been selected for this job and meters have been installed in Vizag, Andhra Pradesh and Yamunagar, Haryana. Test of these meters have been carried out in NABL accredited labs. It is expected that around 50 lakh CFLs will be replaced in each DISCOM area.

In order to reduce the transaction costs associated with the approval of CDM projects, BEE has developed a Programme of Activities (PoA) which would serve as an umbrella CDM project, and would be registered with the CDM Executive Board. The individual projects, designed to be in conformance with the umbrella project, would be added to the umbrella project as and when they are prepared. The development of the PoA is a voluntary action on the part of BEE, and it would not seek any commercial or CDM revenues from the PoA. On the other hand, BEE will, on behalf of the Government of India take the responsibility of monitoring of all project areas after the DISCOMs and the CFL suppliers have entered into a tripartite agreement (TPA) with BEE.


As for the reftence of authenticated website

Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE), Ministry of Power, Govt. of India, in coordination with Indo-German Energy Programme (IGEN), sponsored by German Technical Cooperation (GTZ), is institutionalizing energy efficiency services and promote energy efficiency delivery mechanisms in all sectors of the economy. www.energymanagertraining.com website is operated and managed by IGEN for BEE.

Okay. If I understand what you are trying to say, it is that the Government of India has contracted with GTZ to help them implement their BEE programs. — CactusWriter | needles 11:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Contract and Cooperation are different Cooperation is free . GTZ mainly operates on behalf of the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ). Hemant Vohra 11:19, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I think I see now. GTZ is a corporation which blurs the line between private and public industry -- a private enterprise owned by the German government which functions in cooperation with public programs. The terms "cooperation" and "contract" are somewhat fluid in this instance. At any rate, GTZ and BEE are working together in a partnership to achieve goals set forth by BEE and the Government of India. Is that right? — CactusWriter | needles 11:37, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the cooperation is free and expenses are born by the German counterparts - Hemant Vohra 11:40, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

And profits as well? — CactusWriter | needles 11:41, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, they can not earn profit as it is FREE COORPORATION, there is no fee - Hemant Vohra 11:43, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Do you mean that GTZ is acting as a charitable organization and that the Government of Germany is funding the expenses? — CactusWriter | needles 11:46, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thats how Inter country coorporations work (for eg. METRO TRAIN SERVICE in Delhi, the technology provided is FREE)- Hemant Vohra 11:50, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Okay, from what I understand now, I think that our initial assessment about spam and advertising in the previous articles was incorrect. I think you should go ahead an expand the articles -- using your own words. Add information about GTZ and the German-Indo Energy group where it is appropriate -- but limit the tone of the writing to neutral facts. Try and use independent sources -- like newspaper, magazines, and journals. Link directly to the BEE or India Government source where possible. And, of course, refrain from adding any copied sources -- everything on those websites is copyrighted and can not be taken directly. I'll keep a watch on the articles as they progress. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Good luck. — CactusWriter | needles 11:58, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - Hemant Vohra 12:01, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at National Mission for Enhanced Efficiency, you will be blocked from editing. Do you have any interest in working WITH other editors, or do you believe that you WP:OWN these articles? Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 05:03, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are is not a Wikipedia administrator. Your knowledge in this area is limited - Hemant Vohra 05:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Continued problems

Hello, Hemant Vohra. You seem to have a misunderstanding here. As we discussed above, these group of articles do concern programs of the government of India. Therefore they fall within the category of the Template:India-gov-stub. This does not mean that the article is limited to that category, only that it is one subject under which it can be sub-categorized. Placing that template on the article simply makes it easier for interested editors from the Wikipedia:WikiProject India to notice the article and to help improve it. Your persistence in reverting proper edits by others is not helping to improve the articles -- and, as correctly explained to you by User:DoriSmith, has become disruptive editing and considered vandalism. This also applies to your behavior toward User:Rsrikanth05 and the improper deletions of his user page. This kind of behavior -- especially towards editors who have been attempting to help you improve these articles -- is not tolerated. Wikipedia operates on a basis of civility and discussion. It also requires considerable time to understand the workings and writing methods of an encyclopedia. There are many experienced editors here who have been trying to help. I must now insist that you heed the warnings, listen to other editors' advice, and discuss any changes in the article. — CactusWriter | needles 07:32, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok - Hemant 17 (talk) 08:54, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

I strongly suggest that you go in for Wiki-Adoption. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 16:49, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - Hemant 17 ([[User talk:Hemant

File:BEE India.jpg

Kindly help me resolve the copy right prolem. I have uploaded a low resolution image to overcome this problem - Hemant 17 (talk) 11:24, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hemant_17&oldid=308861946"