User talk:Hj108

Hj108

Mistaken Identity

I really don't know about that Youtube account. And believe me thousands of people can use those kinds of name. Anyway, we shouldn't be bringing in outside news to wiki. Regards. --Johnxxx9 (talk) 15:11, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

J-10 Article

Hi,

Thanks for the work you're doing on the J-10B article. Please understand that deleting informative links can lead to edit warring. Please discuss any issues on the page talk page before taking action. Thanks & Best. --plamkii (talk) May 01 2009 —Preceding undated comment added 17:51, 1 May 2009 (UTC).

Posted the following reply on your talk page and on J-10 article:

"Hello. Please understand that GrandeStrategy may be an informative link, but it is still a blog. The GrandeStrategy article on J-10B is composed of information from other sources (which are already added to the external links section of the J-10 article) and speculation by the author. If you add the link again, I will not remove it because I do not want an edit war. But I will bring the issue up on the talk page and get more experienced editors involved. Blogs by enthusiasts are not authoritative sources. You told me to discuss this matter on the article talk page before editing, but you did not do so yourself. Please do not add warnings on my talk page when you are not willing to follow their advice yourself. Hj108 (talk) 15:17, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Hj108 (talk) 15:23, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Pakistan Air Force

Hello,

Thanks you for your effort to improve the concerned article. Please note that removal of sourced, informative content is highly undesirable as it would most likely be reverted and can lead to edit warring. Feel free to make changes to the tone of the sentences, add more information backed by reliable, scholarly sources and raise any outstanding issues on the article's talkpage. Have a nice day --Incidious (talk) 22:17, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello,

Thanks for raising for raising your concerns. If you would see, sources [10], [11] and [8] are all neutral sources. Regarding the Indian sources, [12] and [13], the information is very much relevant to the topic and necessary too as it explains the losses incurred by the Indians. I'm sorry but I failed to see any form of bias in that piece of information and it seems rather subjective. Regarding Sabres, read the caption on the ride side of page 164: it says The F-86s did well against Hunters and Mysteres but had trouble dealing with the Gnats. Thanks --Incidious (talk) 12:42, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

I removed source [12] for the sake of neutrality. As of now, out of all the sources mentioned in the 1965 war section, only one seems to be Indian. Thanks --Incidious (talk) 12:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Also, in the 1971 war section, the source [18] only mentions that the PAF was unable to intervene during IAF's raid on Pakistani air bases and Indian Navy's raid on Karachi. The source does not mention PAF's explanation for its inaction. However, I do understand your sensitivities attached to this touchy issue. --Incidious (talk) 12:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

What is your e-mail

what is your e-mail.User:Yousaf465 (talk)

Yes it's not safe to comment on talk pages something are better discussed on e-mail.you may e-mail at yousaf465@gmail.com for further information.As far jf-17 is concerned I nominated it for Ga so I couldn't review it.User:Yousaf465 (talk)

Your comments need at FS

Your comments are needed here[1].User:Yousaf465 (talk)

Thanks for supporting FS

Thanks for your support for the FS.for further detail see above.User:Yousaf465 (talk)

Your support is also needed here.[2]User:Yousaf465 (talk)

Re: Ra'ad and Babur cruise missile title change?

I apologize for the late reply. I was away for a couple of days. In response to your question, it is a good idea to rename Ra'ad to Raad cruise missile.

Your proposal could be implemented based on community consensus in accordance to Wikipedia guidelines, we must initiate a poll on the talk page of the article. If the community consensus is successful the changes are permitted to take place otherwise they would be reverted back to the orignal form. Further more, I would like to propose redirecting. You could create a page using the following code to redirect your article to the orginal article # REDIRECT Anything you feel is appropriate this does not require consensus. I hope this is helps.

If you require any assistance feel free to contact me. :) Faraz (talk) 17:40, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Pakistani Aviation

Please join.The articles your are currently editing comes under it's scope.Here is the [3]yousaf465'

New! Pakistani military history task force

  

I am contacting you because I see you have contributed to articles about the military history of Pakistan or its armed forces. To help improve Wikipedia's coverage of this important topic, and to provide support and coordination of individual editors, the Military history WikiProject has now set up a newPakistani military history task force.

If you would like to join up, as a founder member of this important new initiative, please add your name to the Participants' List. Thank you for your time. I hope you can help.  Roger Davies ^talk 06:34, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Wikiwings

		Wikiwings
		for your efforts on Chengdu J-10 MilborneOne (talk) 15:22, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

PAA

Does the ground equiqment also bleongs to PAA Aviation].yousaf465'

KLJ-7 Radar

I saw a recent edit from you changing "bears similarities' to "bares similarities". I think you misunderstood, the actual word is "bears similarities". Bears --> transitive verb "be marked by something:" to show physical signs of something eg bears a likeness to his uncle. See Encarta dictionary entry#7. So, the correct phrase would be "The KLJ-7 uses a mechanically-steered slotted array antenna and bears similarities with the various Russian radars imported in the 1990s." You may delete this talk page entry after making the change. Regards Raza0007 [[[User talk:Raza0007|Talk]]] 17:30, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

My bad! Thanks for fixing it.--Hj108 (talk) 17:51, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

WIKIREADER41 Indo-Pak war 1971

The Hindutva POV pusher has been removing your valid edits from the indo pak war of 1971 look at these difs they will show his Hindutva mentality: [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] Just a preveiw of the POV of the Indian american nationalist Wikireader41 remove all his edits please 86.158.234.4 (talk) 11:05, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Who the hell do you think you are telling me to remove somebody's edits? If you can't be bothered to sign up and help me counter those kinds of editors, stay the hell off my talk page.

--Hj108 (talk) 11:35, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Oh shut up i warned you of his edits if i didnt tell you it would be vandalized further take your anger out on the anti pakistani idiot wikireader41 not me 86.158.234.4 (talk) 12:18, 22 August 2009 (UTC)