User talk:Xellas: Difference between revisions
You have been blocked for edit warring on Location hypotheses of Atlantis. using TW |
|||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for {{#if:31 hours|a period of '''31 hours'''|a short time}} in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] to prevent further [[WP:DE|disruption]] caused by your engagement in an [[WP:EDITWAR|edit war]]{{#if:Location hypotheses of Atlantis| at [[:Location hypotheses of Atlantis]]}}. During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[WP:CON|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[WP:PP|page protection]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:true|[[User:Jac16888|<font color="Blue">Jac</font><font color="Green">16888</font>]][[User talk:Jac16888|<sup><font color="red">Talk</font></sup>]] 00:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC)}}</div>{{z9}}<!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> |
<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for {{#if:31 hours|a period of '''31 hours'''|a short time}} in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] to prevent further [[WP:DE|disruption]] caused by your engagement in an [[WP:EDITWAR|edit war]]{{#if:Location hypotheses of Atlantis| at [[:Location hypotheses of Atlantis]]}}. During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[WP:CON|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[WP:PP|page protection]]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:true|[[User:Jac16888|<font color="Blue">Jac</font><font color="Green">16888</font>]][[User talk:Jac16888|<sup><font color="red">Talk</font></sup>]] 00:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC)}}</div>{{z9}}<!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> |
||
{{unblock|I have been blocked unreasonbly without explanations. The person that blocked me failed to understand that the 3RR was done by a different person whom is been blocked as all, way before me. I did delete a junk of info on Location of Atlantis because it was so technicall and so long. It was part on an essay written by the author}} |
Revision as of 00:23, 23 August 2009
Welcome!
|
Sarmast stuff
Most of that wasn't added by Sarmast (who has edited here but I explained to him that he had a conflict of interest and he's mostly gone away) but by a geologist who seems to know his stuff and was debunking Sarmast. Dougweller (talk) 18:45, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
August 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Location hypotheses of Atlantis. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 19:08, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Location hypotheses of Atlantis. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. — Kralizec! (talk) 00:04, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Friendly note regarding talk page messages
Hello. As a recent editor to User talk:98.248.33.198, I wanted to leave a friendly reminder that as per WP:USER, editors may remove messages at will from their own talk pages. While we may prefer that comments be archived instead, policy does not prohibit users -including anonymous editors like this one- from deleting messages or warnings from their own talk pages. The only kinds of talk page messages that cannot be removed (as per WP:BLANKING) are declined unblock requests (but only while blocks are still in effect), confirmed sockpuppet notices, or shared IP header templates (for unregistered editors). These exceptions only exist in order to keep a user from potentially gaming the system. Thanks, — Kralizec! (talk) 23:24, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Xellas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have been blocked unreasonbly without explanations. The person that blocked me failed to understand that the 3RR was done by a different person whom is been blocked as all, way before me. I did delete a junk of info on Location of Atlantis because it was so technicall and so long. It was part on an essay written by the author |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I have been blocked unreasonbly without explanations. The person that blocked me failed to understand that the 3RR was done by a different person whom is been blocked as all, way before me. I did delete a junk of info on Location of Atlantis because it was so technicall and so long. It was part on an essay written by the author |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I have been blocked unreasonbly without explanations. The person that blocked me failed to understand that the 3RR was done by a different person whom is been blocked as all, way before me. I did delete a junk of info on Location of Atlantis because it was so technicall and so long. It was part on an essay written by the author |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}