Talk:Abortion in Japan: Difference between revisions
Discussion of how prevalent abortion is as a form of birth control. |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Perhaps someone with good Wikipedia / HTML skills can alter this article's first graf to state that. |
Perhaps someone with good Wikipedia / HTML skills can alter this article's first graf to state that. |
||
[[Special:Contributions/38.165.15.200|38.165.15.200]] ([[User talk:38.165.15.200|talk]]) 14:59, 19 June 2009 (UTC) |
[[Special:Contributions/38.165.15.200|38.165.15.200]] ([[User talk:38.165.15.200|talk]]) 14:59, 19 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
The phrase "The people themselves recognised the need for a eugenics law" is far from neutral. |
|||
Does anyone besides me have any opinions? [[User:Habemus|Habemus]] ([[User talk:Habemus|talk]]) 22:17, 25 August 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:17, 25 August 2009
There seems to be some confusion over how prevalent abortion is in Japan. This article has at times stated that it is the most common method of birth control, and at other times that it is the least common method of birth control in the country. I removed the superlatives and stated simply that it is common. There is an article that provides stats, and it would indicate that abortion is less common than use of a condom and more common than the pill: <a href="http://family.jrank.org/pages/993/Japan-Birth-Control-Abortion.html">Japan - Birth Control And Abortion</a>
Perhaps someone with good Wikipedia / HTML skills can alter this article's first graf to state that. 38.165.15.200 (talk) 14:59, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
The phrase "The people themselves recognised the need for a eugenics law" is far from neutral. Does anyone besides me have any opinions? Habemus (talk) 22:17, 25 August 2009 (UTC)