Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ladnavfan: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m ←Created page with '{{subst:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Blank report template header}} ;Suspected sockpuppets * {{checkuser|1=Fachette.expert }} <!--## Add further sockpup...' |
SPCUClerkbot (talk | contribs) BOT updates, actions follow: (listing accounts notified) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{SPIcat}} |
{{SPIcat}} |
||
;Suspected sockpuppets <!-- BOTDONE_USER_NOTICE DO_NOT_MODIFY [[Ladnavfan]][[Fachette.expert ]] (THIS CURRENTLY IS NOT ACTIVE, this comment is for testing only) --> |
|||
;Suspected sockpuppets |
|||
* {{checkuser|1=Fachette.expert }} |
* {{checkuser|1=Fachette.expert }} |
||
<!--## Add further sockpuppets if any, below these ##--> |
<!--## Add further sockpuppets if any, below these ##--> |
||
Revision as of 14:43, 26 August 2009
Ladnavfan
Ladnavfan (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ladnavfan/Archive.
Report date August 26 2009, 14:43 (UTC)
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Fachette.expert (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Similarity of names:
- Fachette.expert is based on Fachette which appears to be a hoax or grossly mistranslated meal. The article was created by the author on 00:58, 24 August 2009
- Ladnavfan is based on Ladnav which appears to be either a hoax or completely NN publication. The article was created by the author 10:47, 24 August 2009
- Timing of creation of accounts
- 00:08, 24 August 2009 Fachette.expert (talk | contribs | block) new user account
- 10:11, 24 August 2009 Ladnavfan (talk | contribs | block) new user account
- The only editors contributing to Fachette were Ladnavfan and Fachette.expert[1]
- Ladnavfan appears to not be a new user as the editor's 14th edit was to file a MFD on an obscure article in Mathsci's user space.
- Evidence submitted by Toddst1
- Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.
- Comments by other users
- Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
- Conclusions