Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:School and university projects/User:Piotrus/Fall 2009: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Suggestion: comment
Line 3: Line 3:
Move up the due dates a bunch. Half the work seems to be after the GA starts, so I would have them submit the thing about half way through the class. Or whatever doesn't conflict with midterms. It will probably help them if they don't have to work a ton on it during finals week. - [[User:Peregrine Fisher|Peregrine Fisher]] ([[User talk:Peregrine Fisher|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Peregrine_Fisher|contribs]]) 21:18, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Move up the due dates a bunch. Half the work seems to be after the GA starts, so I would have them submit the thing about half way through the class. Or whatever doesn't conflict with midterms. It will probably help them if they don't have to work a ton on it during finals week. - [[User:Peregrine Fisher|Peregrine Fisher]] ([[User talk:Peregrine Fisher|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Peregrine_Fisher|contribs]]) 21:18, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
:I did think about that; this class will have twice as much time to work on the GA than the summer one, and hopefully they will be done by the finals. This time deadlines are graded, and I am stressing collaboration, so articles entering GA review should be significantly better - and the groups more motivated - than in the last edition. At least, that's the plan :) --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 18:07, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
:I did think about that; this class will have twice as much time to work on the GA than the summer one, and hopefully they will be done by the finals. This time deadlines are graded, and I am stressing collaboration, so articles entering GA review should be significantly better - and the groups more motivated - than in the last edition. At least, that's the plan :) --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 18:07, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
::GAN on November 16, and must have been passed by December 11? If so, that sounds good. - [[User:Peregrine Fisher|Peregrine Fisher]] ([[User talk:Peregrine Fisher|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/Peregrine_Fisher|contribs]]) 18:22, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:22, 26 August 2009

Suggestion

Move up the due dates a bunch. Half the work seems to be after the GA starts, so I would have them submit the thing about half way through the class. Or whatever doesn't conflict with midterms. It will probably help them if they don't have to work a ton on it during finals week. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 21:18, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did think about that; this class will have twice as much time to work on the GA than the summer one, and hopefully they will be done by the finals. This time deadlines are graded, and I am stressing collaboration, so articles entering GA review should be significantly better - and the groups more motivated - than in the last edition. At least, that's the plan :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 18:07, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
GAN on November 16, and must have been passed by December 11? If so, that sounds good. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 18:22, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]