Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Witch (etymology): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
vote keep
Ihcoyc (talk | contribs)
Line 7: Line 7:
<hr style="width:50%;" />
<hr style="width:50%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|<font color=#BF3B30>Relisted</font>]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <font color="navy">'''[[User:NuclearWarfare|NW]]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|Talk]]</font>)'' 15:45, 27 August 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|<font color=#BF3B30>Relisted</font>]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <font color="navy">'''[[User:NuclearWarfare|NW]]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|Talk]]</font>)'' 15:45, 27 August 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
*'''Keep'''. The talk page indicates that this complicated etymology was broken out of the [[Witchcraft]] and [[Wicca]] articles. There's easily enough referenced information here to support a stand alone article; it couldn't be merged back without either loss of data or undue emphasis; and the etymology is complicated enough to warrant a full treatment. - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] ([[User talk:Ihcoyc|talk]]) 16:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

===<!-- insert a section edit --> ===
===<!-- insert a section edit --> ===
{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Witch (etymology)|[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]|}}
{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Witch (etymology)|[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]|}}

Revision as of 16:55, 27 August 2009

Witch (etymology) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing but etymology, which is dictionary content. Also includes unrelated section on the word "Wicca". Powers T 15:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW (Talk) 15:45, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The talk page indicates that this complicated etymology was broken out of the Witchcraft and Wicca articles. There's easily enough referenced information here to support a stand alone article; it couldn't be merged back without either loss of data or undue emphasis; and the etymology is complicated enough to warrant a full treatment. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]