Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Witch (etymology): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
vote keep |
→Witch (etymology): keep |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<hr style="width:50%;" /> |
<hr style="width:50%;" /> |
||
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|<font color=#BF3B30>Relisted</font>]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <font color="navy">'''[[User:NuclearWarfare|NW]]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|Talk]]</font>)'' 15:45, 27 August 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|<font color=#BF3B30>Relisted</font>]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <font color="navy">'''[[User:NuclearWarfare|NW]]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|Talk]]</font>)'' 15:45, 27 August 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
||
*'''Keep'''. The talk page indicates that this complicated etymology was broken out of the [[Witchcraft]] and [[Wicca]] articles. There's easily enough referenced information here to support a stand alone article; it couldn't be merged back without either loss of data or undue emphasis; and the etymology is complicated enough to warrant a full treatment. - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] ([[User talk:Ihcoyc|talk]]) 16:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC) |
|||
===<!-- insert a section edit --> === |
===<!-- insert a section edit --> === |
||
{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Witch (etymology)|[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]|}} |
{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Witch (etymology)|[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]|}} |
Revision as of 16:55, 27 August 2009
- Witch (etymology) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nothing but etymology, which is dictionary content. Also includes unrelated section on the word "Wicca". Powers T 15:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW (Talk) 15:45, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. The talk page indicates that this complicated etymology was broken out of the Witchcraft and Wicca articles. There's easily enough referenced information here to support a stand alone article; it couldn't be merged back without either loss of data or undue emphasis; and the etymology is complicated enough to warrant a full treatment. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
- Keep A whole article on the etymology of a word. Isn't this what makes Wikipedia a great resource? Francium12 16:38, 27 August 2009 (UTC)