Talk:Moral responsibility: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* '''Keep''' - We should leave the article here for no less than a week as a reasoned answer to the Register article[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/12/12/wikipedia_no_responsibility/]. With the revisions I suggested above, I think it's a meritous article, particularly for those who come looking for some understanding about what Wikipedia is and how it works. -- [[User:Ke4roh|ke4roh]] 15:29, 12 December 2005 (UTC) |
* '''Keep''' - We should leave the article here for no less than a week as a reasoned answer to the Register article[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/12/12/wikipedia_no_responsibility/]. With the revisions I suggested above, I think it's a meritous article, particularly for those who come looking for some understanding about what Wikipedia is and how it works. -- [[User:Ke4roh|ke4roh]] 15:29, 12 December 2005 (UTC) |
||
::Wikipedia pages aren't meant to be answers to articles. This page needs to be revised into a quality article about moral responsibility in general, not something specific to wikipedia only. If it's not revised, delete it [[User:BillPP|BillPP]] 15:49, 12 December 2005 (UTC) |
::Wikipedia pages aren't meant to be answers to articles. This page needs to be revised into a quality article about moral responsibility in general, not something specific to wikipedia only. If it's not revised, delete it [[User:BillPP|BillPP]] 15:49, 12 December 2005 (UTC) |
||
* '''Keep'' - This Wikipedia page should be refined into a meaningful page about the idea of "Moral Responsibility". The topic itself is an actual philosphical term. See Moral Responsibility in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility/]. [[User:Gonknet|Gonknet]] 16:01, 12 December 2005 (UTC) |
* '''Keep''' - This Wikipedia page should be refined into a meaningful page about the idea of "Moral Responsibility". The topic itself is an actual philosphical term. See Moral Responsibility in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility/]. [[User:Gonknet|Gonknet]] 16:01, 12 December 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:00, 12 December 2005
Now that we have an entry on "Moral Responsibility"[1], it should probably offer a link to the appropriate Wikipedia:... pages covering the responsibility of editors for keeping their facts straight and readers for editing mistakes they find, or at least checking facts if they intend to do anything important with them. The appropriate information would provide a clear object lesson in "moral responsibility" for the reader -- ke4roh 15:24, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
Speedy deletion?
- Keep - We should leave the article here for no less than a week as a reasoned answer to the Register article[2]. With the revisions I suggested above, I think it's a meritous article, particularly for those who come looking for some understanding about what Wikipedia is and how it works. -- ke4roh 15:29, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
- Wikipedia pages aren't meant to be answers to articles. This page needs to be revised into a quality article about moral responsibility in general, not something specific to wikipedia only. If it's not revised, delete it BillPP 15:49, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - This Wikipedia page should be refined into a meaningful page about the idea of "Moral Responsibility". The topic itself is an actual philosphical term. See Moral Responsibility in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy[3]. Gonknet 16:01, 12 December 2005 (UTC)